% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Brinker:143587,
author = {T. J. Brinker$^*$ and A. Hekler$^*$ and A. H. Enk and J.
Klode and A. Hauschild and C. Berking and B. Schilling and
S. Haferkamp and D. Schadendorf and T. Holland-Letz$^*$ and
J. S. Utikal$^*$ and C. von Kalle$^*$ and W. Ludwig-Peitsch
and J. Sirokay and L. Heinzerling and M. Albrecht and K.
Baratella and L. Bischof and E. Chorti and A. Dith and C.
Drusio and N. Giese and E. Gratsias and K. Griewank and S.
Hallasch and Z. Hanhart and S. Herz and K. Hohaus and P.
Jansen and F. Jockenhöfer and T. Kanaki and S. Knispel and
K. Leonhard and A. Martaki and L. Matei and J. Matull and A.
Olischewski and M. Petri and J.-M. Placke and S. Raub and K.
Salva and S. Schlott and E. Sody and N. Steingrube and I.
Stoffels and S. Ugurel and A. Zaremba and C. Gebhardt and N.
Booken and M. Christolouka and K. Buder-Bakhaya and T.
Bokor-Billmann and A. Enk and P. Gholam and H. Hänßle and
M. Salzmann and S. Schäfer and K. Schäkel and T. Schank
and A.-S. Bohne and S. Deffaa and K. Drerup and F. Egberts
and A.-S. Erkens and B. Ewald and S. Falkvoll and S. Gerdes
and V. Harde and A. Hauschild and M. Jost and K. Kosova and
L. Messinger and M. Metzner and K. Morrison and R. Motamedi
and A. Pinczker and A. Rosenthal and N. Scheller and T.
Schwarz and D. Stölzl and F. Thielking and E. Tomaschewski
and U. Wehkamp and M. Weichenthal and O. Wiedow and C. M.
Bär and S. Bender-Säbelkampf and M. Horbrügger and A.
Karoglan and L. Kraas and J. Faulhaber and C. Geraud and Z.
Guo and P. Koch and M. Linke and N. Maurier and V. Müller
and B. Thomas and J. S. Utikal$^*$ and A. S. M. Alamri and
A. Baczako and C. Berking and M. Betke and C. Haas and D.
Hartmann and M. V. Heppt and K. Kilian and S. Krammer and N.
L. Lapczynski and S. Mastnik and S. Nasifoglu and C. Ruini
and E. Sattler and M. Schlaak and H. Wolff and B. Achatz and
A. Bergbreiter and K. Drexler and M. Ettinger and S.
Haferkamp and A. Halupczok and M. Hegemann and V. Dinauer
and M. Maagk and M. Mickler and B. Philipp and A. Wilm and
C. Wittmann and A. Gesierich and V. Glutsch and K. Kahlert
and A. Kerstan and B. Schilling and P. Schrüfer},
collaboration = {Collaborators},
title = {{D}eep learning outperformed 136 of 157 dermatologists in a
head-to-head dermoscopic melanoma image classification
task.},
journal = {European journal of cancer},
volume = {113},
issn = {0959-8049},
address = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
publisher = {Elsevier},
reportid = {DKFZ-2019-01167},
pages = {47 - 54},
year = {2019},
abstract = {Recent studies have successfully demonstrated the use of
deep-learning algorithms for dermatologist-level
classification of suspicious lesions by the use of excessive
proprietary image databases and limited numbers of
dermatologists. For the first time, the performance of a
deep-learning algorithm trained by open-source images
exclusively is compared to a large number of dermatologists
covering all levels within the clinical hierarchy.We used
methods from enhanced deep learning to train a convolutional
neural network (CNN) with 12,378 open-source dermoscopic
images. We used 100 images to compare the performance of the
CNN to that of the 157 dermatologists from 12 university
hospitals in Germany. Outperformance of dermatologists by
the deep neural network was measured in terms of
sensitivity, specificity and receiver operating
characteristics.The mean sensitivity and specificity
achieved by the dermatologists with dermoscopic images was
$74.1\%$ (range $40.0\%-100\%)$ and $60\%$ (range
$21.3\%-91.3\%),$ respectively. At a mean sensitivity of
$74.1\%,$ the CNN exhibited a mean specificity of $86.5\%$
(range $70.8\%-91.3\%).$ At a mean specificity of $60\%,$ a
mean sensitivity of $87.5\%$ (range $80\%-95\%)$ was
achieved by our algorithm. Among the dermatologists, the
chief physicians showed the highest mean specificity of
$69.2\%$ at a mean sensitivity of $73.3\%.$ With the same
high specificity of $69.2\%,$ the CNN had a mean sensitivity
of $84.5\%.A$ CNN trained by open-source images exclusively
outperformed 136 of the 157 dermatologists and all the
different levels of experience (from junior to chief
physicians) in terms of average specificity and
sensitivity.},
cin = {B340 / C060 / A370},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)B340-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)C060-20160331 /
I:(DE-He78)A370-20160331},
pnm = {312 - Functional and structural genomics (POF3-312)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-312},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:30981091},
doi = {10.1016/j.ejca.2019.04.001},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/143587},
}