000143728 001__ 143728
000143728 005__ 20240229112606.0
000143728 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1007/s00420-019-01427-2
000143728 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:31028471
000143728 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0020-5923
000143728 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0340-0131
000143728 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0365-2564
000143728 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0367-9977
000143728 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1432-1246
000143728 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:68186198
000143728 037__ $$aDKFZ-2019-01298
000143728 041__ $$aeng
000143728 082__ $$a610
000143728 1001_ $$00000-0002-6602-6292$$aDeltour, Isabelle$$b0
000143728 245__ $$aValidation of self-reported occupational noise exposure in participants of a French case-control study on acoustic neuroma.
000143728 260__ $$aHeidelberg$$bSpringer$$c2019
000143728 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000143728 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000143728 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1572343080_25877
000143728 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000143728 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000143728 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000143728 520__ $$aTo validate self-reported occupational loud noise exposure against expert evaluation of noise levels in a French case-control study on acoustic neuroma and to estimate the impact of exposure misclassification on risk estimation.Noise levels were evaluated in 1006 jobs held by 111 cases and 217 population controls by an expert. Case-control differences in self-reporting were analyzed with logistic models. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and observed agreement of the self-reports were computed relative to the expert evaluation. They were used to calibrate the odds ratio (OR) between lifetime ever occupational loud noise exposure and the risk of acoustic neuroma, without adjustment for measurement error of the expert assessments.Cases reported noise levels in individual jobs closer to the expert assessment than controls, but the case-control difference was small for lifetime exposures. For expert-rated exposure of 80 dB(A), reporting of individual jobs by cases was more sensitive (54% in cases, 37% in controls), whereas specificity (91% in cases, 93% in controls) and observed agreement (82% in cases, 81% in controls) were similar. When lifetime exposure was considered, sensitivity increased (76% in cases, 65% in controls), while cases specificity decreased (84%). When these values were used to calibrate self-reports for exposure misclassification compared to expert evaluation at 80 dB(A), the crude OR of 1.7 was reduced to 1.3.Despite the relatively accurate reporting of loud noise, the impact of the calibration on the OR was non-negligible.
000143728 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-313$$a313 - Cancer risk factors and prevention (POF3-313)$$cPOF3-313$$fPOF III$$x0
000143728 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed,
000143728 7001_ $$aMassardier-Pilonchery, Amélie$$b1
000143728 7001_ $$0P:(DE-He78)e9acc181eadf1c41b9a43639fc1c9faf$$aSchlehofer, Brigitte$$b2$$udkfz
000143728 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSchlaefer, Klaus$$b3
000143728 7001_ $$aHours, Martine$$b4
000143728 7001_ $$00000-0001-9687-2134$$aSchüz, Joachim$$b5
000143728 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1459213-7$$a10.1007/s00420-019-01427-2$$n7$$p991-1001$$tInternational archives of occupational and environmental health$$v92$$x1432-1246$$y2019
000143728 909CO $$ooai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:143728$$pVDB
000143728 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)2036810-0$$6P:(DE-He78)e9acc181eadf1c41b9a43639fc1c9faf$$aDeutsches Krebsforschungszentrum$$b2$$kDKFZ
000143728 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)2036810-0$$6P:(DE-HGF)0$$aDeutsches Krebsforschungszentrum$$b3$$kDKFZ
000143728 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-313$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-310$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-300$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bGesundheit$$lKrebsforschung$$vCancer risk factors and prevention$$x0
000143728 9141_ $$y2019
000143728 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz
000143728 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000143728 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000143728 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0310$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bNCBI Molecular Biology Database
000143728 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bINT ARCH OCC ENV HEA : 2017
000143728 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search
000143728 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC
000143728 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List
000143728 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0110$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index
000143728 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000143728 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000143728 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1110$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Clinical Medicine
000143728 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1030$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Life Sciences
000143728 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews
000143728 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5
000143728 9201_ $$0I:(DE-He78)C030-20160331$$kC030$$lUmwelt-Epidemiologie$$x0
000143728 980__ $$ajournal
000143728 980__ $$aVDB
000143728 980__ $$aI:(DE-He78)C030-20160331
000143728 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED