% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Deltour:143728,
      author       = {I. Deltour and A. Massardier-Pilonchery and B.
                      Schlehofer$^*$ and K. Schlaefer$^*$ and M. Hours and J.
                      Schüz},
      title        = {{V}alidation of self-reported occupational noise exposure
                      in participants of a {F}rench case-control study on acoustic
                      neuroma.},
      journal      = {International archives of occupational and environmental
                      health},
      volume       = {92},
      number       = {7},
      issn         = {1432-1246},
      address      = {Heidelberg},
      publisher    = {Springer},
      reportid     = {DKFZ-2019-01298},
      pages        = {991-1001},
      year         = {2019},
      abstract     = {To validate self-reported occupational loud noise exposure
                      against expert evaluation of noise levels in a French
                      case-control study on acoustic neuroma and to estimate the
                      impact of exposure misclassification on risk
                      estimation.Noise levels were evaluated in 1006 jobs held by
                      111 cases and 217 population controls by an expert.
                      Case-control differences in self-reporting were analyzed
                      with logistic models. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and
                      negative predictive values, and observed agreement of the
                      self-reports were computed relative to the expert
                      evaluation. They were used to calibrate the odds ratio (OR)
                      between lifetime ever occupational loud noise exposure and
                      the risk of acoustic neuroma, without adjustment for
                      measurement error of the expert assessments.Cases reported
                      noise levels in individual jobs closer to the expert
                      assessment than controls, but the case-control difference
                      was small for lifetime exposures. For expert-rated exposure
                      of 80 dB(A), reporting of individual jobs by cases was more
                      sensitive $(54\%$ in cases, $37\%$ in controls), whereas
                      specificity $(91\%$ in cases, $93\%$ in controls) and
                      observed agreement $(82\%$ in cases, $81\%$ in controls)
                      were similar. When lifetime exposure was considered,
                      sensitivity increased $(76\%$ in cases, $65\%$ in controls),
                      while cases specificity decreased $(84\%).$ When these
                      values were used to calibrate self-reports for exposure
                      misclassification compared to expert evaluation at
                      80 dB(A), the crude OR of 1.7 was reduced to 1.3.Despite
                      the relatively accurate reporting of loud noise, the impact
                      of the calibration on the OR was non-negligible.},
      cin          = {C030},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {I:(DE-He78)C030-20160331},
      pnm          = {313 - Cancer risk factors and prevention (POF3-313)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-313},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {pmid:31028471},
      doi          = {10.1007/s00420-019-01427-2},
      url          = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/143728},
}