% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Dimou:143866,
author = {N. L. Dimou and N. Papadimitriou and D. Gill and S.
Christakoudi and N. Murphy and M. J. Gunter and R. C. Travis
and T. J. Key and R. T. Fortner$^*$ and P. C. Haycock and S.
J. Lewis and K. Muir and R. M. Martin and K. K. Tsilidis},
title = {{S}ex hormone binding globulin and risk of breast cancer: a
{M}endelian randomization study.},
journal = {International journal of epidemiology},
volume = {48},
number = {3},
issn = {1464-3685},
address = {Oxford},
publisher = {Oxford Univ. Press},
reportid = {DKFZ-2019-01428},
pages = {807-816},
year = {2019},
abstract = {There are observational data suggesting an inverse
association between circulating concentrations of sex
hormone binding globulin (SHBG) and risk of postmenopausal
breast cancer. However, causality is uncertain and few
studies have investigated this association by tumour
receptor status. We aimed to investigate these associations
under the causal framework of Mendelian randomization
(MR).We used summary association estimates extracted from
published genome-wide association study (GWAS) meta-analyses
for SHBG and breast cancer, to perform two-sample MR
analyses. Summary statistics were available for 122 977
overall breast cancer cases, of which 69 501 were estrogen
receptor positive (ER+ve) and 21 468 were ER-ve, and
105 974 controls. To control for potential horizontal
pleiotropy acting via body mass index (BMI), we performed
multivariable inverse-variance weighted (IVW) MR as the main
analysis, with the robustness of this approach further
tested in sensitivity analyses.The multivariable IVW MR
analysis indicated a lower risk of overall (odds ratio [OR]:
0.94; $95\%$ confidence interval [CI]: 0.90, 0.98; P: 0.006)
and ER+ve (OR: $0.92; 95\%$ CI: 0.87, 0.97; P: 0.003)
breast cancer, and a higher risk of ER-ve disease (OR: 1.09;
$95\%$ CI: 1.00, 1.18; P: 0.047) per 25 nmol/L higher
SHBG levels. Sensitivity analyses were consistent with the
findings of the main analysis.We corroborated the previous
literature evidence coming from observational studies for a
potentially causal inverse association between SHBG
concentrations and risk of ER+ve breast cancer, but our
findings also suggested a potential novel positive
association with ER-ve disease that warrants further
investigation, given the low prior probability of being
true.},
cin = {C020},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)C020-20160331},
pnm = {313 - Cancer risk factors and prevention (POF3-313)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-313},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:31143958},
doi = {10.1093/ije/dyz107},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/143866},
}