% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Ooi:144148,
author = {B. N. S. Ooi and H. Loh and P. J. Ho and R. L. Milne and G.
Giles and C. Gao and P. Kraft and E. M. John and A. Swerdlow
and H. Brenner$^*$ and A. H. Wu and C. Haiman and D. G.
Evans and W. Zheng and P. A. Fasching and J. E. Castelao and
A. Kwong and X. Shen and K. Czene and P. Hall and A. Dunning
and D. Easton and M. Hartman and J. Li},
title = {{T}he genetic interplay between body mass index, breast
size and breast cancer risk: a {M}endelian randomization
analysis.},
journal = {International journal of epidemiology},
volume = {48},
number = {3},
issn = {1464-3685},
address = {Oxford},
publisher = {Oxford Univ. Press},
reportid = {DKFZ-2019-01697},
pages = {781-794},
year = {2019},
abstract = {Evidence linking breast size to breast cancer risk has been
inconsistent, and its interpretation is often hampered by
confounding factors such as body mass index (BMI). Here, we
used linkage disequilibrium score regression and two-sample
Mendelian randomization (MR) to examine the genetic
associations between BMI, breast size and breast cancer
risk.Summary-level genotype data from 23andMe, Inc (breast
size, n = 33 790), the Breast Cancer Association
Consortium (breast cancer risk, n = 228 951) and the
Genetic Investigation of ANthropometric Traits (BMI,
n = 183 507) were used for our analyses. In assessing
causal relationships, four complementary MR techniques
[inverse variance weighted (IVW), weighted median, weighted
mode and MR-Egger regression] were used to test the
robustness of the results.The genetic correlation (rg)
estimated between BMI and breast size was high
(rg = 0.50, P = 3.89x10-43). All MR methods provided
consistent evidence that higher genetically predicted BMI
was associated with larger breast size [odds ratio (ORIVW):
2.06 (1.80-2.35), P = 1.38x10-26] and lower overall
breast cancer risk [ORIVW: 0.81 (0.74-0.89),
P = 9.44x10-6]. No evidence of a relationship between
genetically predicted breast size and breast cancer risk was
found except when using the weighted median and weighted
mode methods, and only with oestrogen receptor (ER)-negative
risk. There was no evidence of reverse causality in any of
the analyses conducted (P > 0.050).Our findings indicate
a potential positive causal association between BMI and
breast size and a potential negative causal association
between BMI and breast cancer risk. We found no clear
evidence for a direct relationship between breast size and
breast cancer risk.},
cin = {C070 / C120 / L101},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)C070-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)C120-20160331 /
I:(DE-He78)L101-20160331},
pnm = {313 - Cancer risk factors and prevention (POF3-313)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-313},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:31243447},
doi = {10.1093/ije/dyz124},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/144148},
}