% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Alwers:144333,
author = {E. Alwers$^*$ and H. Bläker and V. Walter$^*$ and L.
Jansen$^*$ and M. Kloor and A. Arnold and J. Sieber-Frank
and E. Herpel and K. E. Tagscherer and W. Roth and J.
Chang-Claude$^*$ and H. Brenner$^*$ and M. Hoffmeister$^*$},
title = {{E}xternal validation of molecular subtype classifications
of colorectal cancer based on microsatellite instability,
{CIMP}, {BRAF} and {KRAS}.},
journal = {BMC cancer},
volume = {19},
number = {1},
issn = {1471-2407},
address = {Heidelberg},
publisher = {Springer},
reportid = {DKFZ-2019-01786},
pages = {681},
year = {2019},
abstract = {Competing molecular classification systems have been
proposed to complement the TNM staging system for a better
prediction of survival in colorectal cancer (CRC). However,
validation studies are so far lacking. The aim of this study
was to validate and extend previously published molecular
classifications of CRC in a large independent cohort of CRC
patients.CRC patients were recruited into a population-based
cohort study (DACHS). Molecular subtypes were categorized
based on three previously published classifications.
Cox-proportional hazard models, based on the same set of
patients and using the same confounders as reported by the
original studies, were used to determine overall,
cancer-specific, or relapse-free survival for each subtype.
Hazard ratios and confidence intervals, as well as
Kaplan-Meier plots were compared to those reported by the
original studies.We observed similar patterns of worse
survival for the microsatellite stable (MSS)/BRAF-mutated
and MSS/KRAS-mutated subtypes in our validation analyses,
which were included in two of the validated classifications.
Of the two MSI subtypes, one defined by additional presence
of CIMP-high and BRAF-mutation and the other by tumors
negative for CIMP, BRAF and KRAS-mutations, we could not
confirm associations with better prognosis as suggested by
one of the classifications. For two of the published
classifications, we were able to provide results for
additional subgroups not included in the original studies
(men, other disease stages, other locations).External
validation of three previously proposed classifications
confirmed findings of worse survival for CRC patients with
MSS subtypes and BRAF or KRAS mutations. Regarding MSI
subtypes, other patient characteristics such as stage of the
tumor, may influence the potential survival benefit. Further
integration of methylation, genetic, and immunological
information is needed to develop and validate a
comprehensive classification that will have relevance for
use in clinical practice.},
cin = {C070 / C120 / C020 / L101},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)C070-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)C120-20160331 /
I:(DE-He78)C020-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)L101-20160331},
pnm = {313 - Cancer risk factors and prevention (POF3-313)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-313},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:31296182},
pmc = {pmc:PMC6624952},
doi = {10.1186/s12885-019-5842-7},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/144333},
}