% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Sachpekidis:144523,
      author       = {C. Sachpekidis and V. Sachpekidis and A. Kopp-Schneider$^*$
                      and G. Arsos and E. Moralidis},
      title        = {{E}quilibrium radionuclide angiography: {I}ntra- and
                      inter-observer repeatability and reproducibility in the
                      assessment of cardiac systolic and diastolic function.},
      journal      = {Journal of nuclear cardiology},
      volume       = {28},
      number       = {4},
      issn         = {1532-6551},
      address      = {New York, NY},
      publisher    = {Springer},
      reportid     = {DKFZ-2019-01971},
      pages        = {1304-1314},
      year         = {2021},
      note         = {2021 Aug;28(4):1304-1314},
      abstract     = {This study aimed to assess intra- and inter-observer
                      agreement in assessing the systolic and diastolic function
                      with equilibrium radionuclide angiography (ERNA).Thirty-two
                      adults underwent baseline and repeat ERNA. An experienced
                      and a trainee operator analyzed the data by assigning
                      regions of interest manually, fully automatically, and
                      semi-automatically. The Bland-Altman statistic (mean ± 1.96
                      standard deviations of the differences) was used to assess
                      the repeatability (two different assessments of a single
                      acquisition) and reproducibility (assessments of two
                      different acquisitions).Using the semi-automated technique
                      the intraobserver repeatability and reproducibility of left
                      ventricular ejection fraction for the experienced physician
                      were - 0.1 ± 3.7 and 0.0 ± 3.8 and for the trainee 2.2
                      ± 10.6 and 1.9 ± 8.4, respectively. The inter-observer
                      repeatability and reproducibility were - 1.8 ± 6.4 and
                      0.4 ± 9.0, respectively. Among the parameters of diastolic
                      function, the intraobserver repeatability and
                      reproducibility of the peak filling rate for the experienced
                      physician were - 0.0 ± 1.1 and - 0.1 ± 1.1 and for the
                      trainee 0.2 ± 3.5 and 0.4 ± 3.7, respectively. The
                      inter-observer repeatability and reproducibility were 0.3 ±
                      1.5 and 0.5 ± 4.0, respectively. Similar was the pattern
                      for the other diastolic indices. In all cases the limits of
                      agreement varied according to the quantification approach.A
                      good repeatability but a moderate reproducibility was found
                      in the assessment of the LVEF. Less good were the findings
                      in the assessment of diastolic function.},
      cin          = {C060},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {I:(DE-He78)C060-20160331},
      pnm          = {313 - Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention (POF4-313)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {pmid:31385225},
      doi          = {10.1007/s12350-019-01830-9},
      url          = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/144523},
}