% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Fu:144780,
author = {M. Fu and Y. Castellano and O. Tigova and C. N. Kyriakos
and G. T. Fong and U. Mons$^*$ and W. A. Zatoński and T. K.
Agar and A. C. K. Quah and A. C. Trofor and T. Demjén and
K. Przewoźniak and Y. Tountas and C. I. Vardavas and E.
Fernández},
collaboration = {E.-P. consortium},
title = {{P}revalence and correlates of different smoking bans in
homes and cars among smokers in six countries of the
{EUREST}-{PLUS} {ITC} {E}urope {S}urveys.},
journal = {Tobacco induced diseases},
volume = {16},
number = {2},
issn = {1617-9625},
address = {[S.l.]},
publisher = {Society},
reportid = {DKFZ-2019-02212},
pages = {A8},
year = {2018},
abstract = {Second-hand smoke exposure has decreased in a number of
countries due to widespread smoke-free legislation in public
places, but exposure is still present in private settings
like homes and cars. Our objective was to describe to what
extent smokers implement smoking rules in these settings in
six European Union (EU) Member States (MS).A cross-sectional
survey was conducted with a nationally representative sample
of adult smokers from Germany, Greece, Hungary, Poland,
Romania and Spain (ITC six European countries survey, part
of the EUREST-PLUS Project). We analysed data from 6011
smokers regarding smoking rules in their homes and in cars
with children (no rules, partial ban, total ban). We
described the prevalence of smoking rules by EU MS and
several sociodemographic and smoking characteristics using
prevalence ratios (PR) and $95\%$ confidence intervals (CI)
derived from Poisson regression models. $\.In$ homes,
$26.5\%$ had a total smoking ban (from $13.1\%$ in Spain to
$35.5\%$ in Hungary), $44.7\%$ had a partial ban (from
$41.3\%$ in Spain to $49.9\%$ in Greece), and $28.8\%$ had
no-smoking rules (from $20.2\%$ in Romania to $45.6\%$ in
Spain). Prevalence of no-smoking rules in cars with children
was $16.2\%$ (from $11.2\%$ in Germany to $20.4\%$ in
Spain). The correlates of not restricting smoking in homes
and cars included: low education (PR=1.51; $95\%CI:$
1.20-1.90 and PR=1.55; $95\%CI:$ 1.09-2.20), smoking >30
cigarettes daily (PR=1.53; $95\%CI:$ 1.10-2.14 and PR=2.66;
$95\%CI:$ 1.40-5.05) and no attempts to quit ever (PR=1.18;
$95\%CI:$ 1.06-1.31 and PR=1.28; $95\%CI:$ 1.06-1.54).Among
smokers in six EU MS, no-smoking rules were more prevalent
in homes than in cars with children. Whilst awareness about
the health effects of exposure to tobacco smoke on children
seemed to be high, more research is needed to better
understand the factors that promote private smoke-free
environments.},
cin = {M050},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)M050-20160331},
pnm = {319H - Addenda (POF3-319H)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-319H},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:31516462},
pmc = {pmc:PMC6661853},
doi = {10.18332/tid/94827},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/144780},
}