% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Schwarz:147217,
author = {D. Schwarz$^*$ and T. Niederle and P. Münch$^*$ and T.
Hielscher$^*$ and J. C. Hassel and H.-P. Schlemmer$^*$ and
M. Platten$^*$ and F. Winkler$^*$ and W. Wick$^*$ and S.
Heiland and S. Delorme$^*$ and M. Bendszus and P. Bäumer
and M. Breckwoldt$^*$},
title = {{S}usceptibility-weighted imaging in malignant melanoma
brain metastasis.},
journal = {Journal of magnetic resonance imaging},
volume = {50},
number = {4},
issn = {1522-2586},
address = {New York, NY},
publisher = {Wiley-Liss},
reportid = {DKFZ-2019-02343},
pages = {1251 - 1259},
year = {2019},
abstract = {The value of cerebral susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI)
in malignant melanoma (MM) patients remains controversial
and the effect of melanin on SWI is not well understood.To
systematically analyze the spectrum of intracerebral
findings in MM brain metastases (BM) on SWI and to determine
the diagnostic value of SWI.Retrospective.In all, 100
patients with melanoma BM (69 having received radiotherapy
[RT] and 31 RT-naïve) and a control group of 100 melanoma
patients without BM were included. For detailed analysis of
signal characteristics, 175 metastases were studied.Gradient
echo SWI sequence at 1.5, 3.0, and 9.4 T.Signal
characteristics from melanotic and amelanotic BMs on SWI
with a focus on blooming artifacts were analyzed, as well as
the presence and longitudinal dynamics of isolated SWI
blooming artifacts in patients with and without
BM.Chi-squared and Student's t-test were used for
contingency table measures and group data of signal and
clinical characteristics, respectively.Melanotic and
amelanotic metastases did not show significant differences
of SWI blooming artifacts $(38\%$ vs. $43\%,$ P = 0.61).
Most metastases without an initial SWI artifact developed a
signal dropout during follow-up $(80\%;$ 65/81). Isolated
SWI artifacts were detected more frequently in patients with
BM (20 vs. 9, P = 0.03), of which the majority were
found in patients who had received RT (17 vs. 3,
P = 0.08). None of these isolated SWI blooming artifacts
turned into overt metastases over time (median follow-up:
8.5 months). Similar findings persisted as remnants of
successfully treated metastases $(88\%;$ 7/8).We conclude
that SWI provides little additional diagnostic benefit over
standard T1 -weighted imaging, as melanin content alone does
not cause diagnostically relevant SWI blooming. Signal
transition of SWI may rather indicate secondary phenomena
like microbleeding and/or metal scavenging. Our results
suggest that isolated SWI artifacts do not constitute vital
tumor tissue but represent unspecific microbleedings,
RT-related parenchymal changes or posttherapeutic remnants
of former metastatic lesions.3 Technical Efficacy Stage: 5
J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:1251-1259.},
cin = {E010 / D170 / C060 / B320 / L101},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)E010-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)D170-20160331 /
I:(DE-He78)C060-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)B320-20160331 /
I:(DE-He78)L101-20160331},
pnm = {314 - Tumor immunology (POF3-314)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-314},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:30793419},
doi = {10.1002/jmri.26692},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/147217},
}