% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Wedekind:147241,
author = {R. Wedekind and P. Keski-Rahkonen and N. Robinot and V.
Viallon and P. Ferrari and E. Engel and M.-C. Boutron-Ruault
and Y. Mahamat-Saleh and F. R. Mancini and T. Kühn$^*$ and
T. Johnson$^*$ and H. Boeing and M. Bergmann and A.
Karakatsani and A. Trichopoulou and H. Peppa and C. Agnoli
and M. Santucci de Magistris and D. Palli and C. Sacerdote
and R. Tumino and M. J. Gunter and I. Huybrechts and A.
Scalbert},
title = {{S}yringol metabolites as new biomarkers for smoked meat
intake.},
journal = {The American journal of clinical nutrition},
volume = {110},
number = {6},
issn = {1938-3207},
address = {Oxford},
publisher = {Oxford University Press},
reportid = {DKFZ-2019-02367},
pages = {1424-1433},
year = {2019},
note = {2019 Dec 1;110(6):1424-1433},
abstract = {Processed meat intake is associated with a higher risk of
colorectal and stomach cancers, coronary artery disease, and
type 2 diabetes and with higher mortality, but the
estimation of intake of different processed meat products in
this heterogeneous food group in epidemiological studies
remains challenging.This work aimed at identifying novel
biomarkers for processed meat intake using metabolomics.An
untargeted, multi-tiered metabolomics approach based on
LC-MS was applied to 33 meat products digested in vitro and
secondly to urine and plasma samples from a randomized
crossover dietary intervention in which 12 volunteers
consumed successively 3 processed meat products (bacon,
salami, and hot dog) and 2 other foods used as controls,
over 3 consecutive days. The putative biomarkers were then
measured in urine from 474 subjects from the European
Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)
cross-sectional study for which detailed 24-h dietary
recalls and FFQs were available.Syringol and 4 derivatives
of syringol were found to be characteristic of in vitro
digests of smoked meat products. The same compounds present
as sulfate esters in urine increased at 2 and 12 h after
consumption of smoked meat products (hot dog, bacon) in the
intervention study. The same syringol sulfates were also
positively associated with recent or habitual consumption of
smoked meat products in urine samples from participants of
the EPIC cross-sectional study. These compounds showed good
discriminative ability for smoked meat intake with receiver
operator characteristic areas under the curve ranging from
0.78 to 0.86 and 0.74 to 0.79 for short-term and habitual
intake, respectively.Four novel syringol sulfates were
identified as potential biomarkers of smoked meat intake and
may be used to improve assessment of smoked meat intake in
epidemiological studies. This trial was registered at
clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03354130.},
cin = {C020},
ddc = {570},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)C020-20160331},
pnm = {313 - Cancer risk factors and prevention (POF3-313)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-313},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:31559413},
doi = {10.1093/ajcn/nqz222},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/147241},
}