001     147241
005     20240229112645.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1093/ajcn/nqz222
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a pmid:31559413
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a 0002-9165
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 0095-9871
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1938-3207
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1938-3215
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a altmetric:67418690
|2 altmetric
037 _ _ |a DKFZ-2019-02367
041 _ _ |a eng
082 _ _ |a 570
100 1 _ |a Wedekind, Roland
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Syringol metabolites as new biomarkers for smoked meat intake.
260 _ _ |a Oxford
|c 2019
|b Oxford University Press
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1578490098_31681
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
500 _ _ |a 2019 Dec 1;110(6):1424-1433
520 _ _ |a Processed meat intake is associated with a higher risk of colorectal and stomach cancers, coronary artery disease, and type 2 diabetes and with higher mortality, but the estimation of intake of different processed meat products in this heterogeneous food group in epidemiological studies remains challenging.This work aimed at identifying novel biomarkers for processed meat intake using metabolomics.An untargeted, multi-tiered metabolomics approach based on LC-MS was applied to 33 meat products digested in vitro and secondly to urine and plasma samples from a randomized crossover dietary intervention in which 12 volunteers consumed successively 3 processed meat products (bacon, salami, and hot dog) and 2 other foods used as controls, over 3 consecutive days. The putative biomarkers were then measured in urine from 474 subjects from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cross-sectional study for which detailed 24-h dietary recalls and FFQs were available.Syringol and 4 derivatives of syringol were found to be characteristic of in vitro digests of smoked meat products. The same compounds present as sulfate esters in urine increased at 2 and 12 h after consumption of smoked meat products (hot dog, bacon) in the intervention study. The same syringol sulfates were also positively associated with recent or habitual consumption of smoked meat products in urine samples from participants of the EPIC cross-sectional study. These compounds showed good discriminative ability for smoked meat intake with receiver operator characteristic areas under the curve ranging from 0.78 to 0.86 and 0.74 to 0.79 for short-term and habitual intake, respectively.Four novel syringol sulfates were identified as potential biomarkers of smoked meat intake and may be used to improve assessment of smoked meat intake in epidemiological studies. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03354130.
536 _ _ |a 313 - Cancer risk factors and prevention (POF3-313)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-313
|c POF3-313
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed,
700 1 _ |a Keski-Rahkonen, Pekka
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Robinot, Nivonirina
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Viallon, Vivian
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Ferrari, Pietro
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Engel, Erwan
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Boutron-Ruault, Marie-Christine
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Mahamat-Saleh, Yahya
|b 7
700 1 _ |a Mancini, Francesca Romana
|b 8
700 1 _ |a Kühn, Tilman
|0 P:(DE-He78)0907a10ba1dc8f53f04907f54f6fdcfe
|b 9
|u dkfz
700 1 _ |a Johnson, Theron
|0 P:(DE-He78)79ab945544e5bc017a2317b6146ed3aa
|b 10
|u dkfz
700 1 _ |a Boeing, Heiner
|b 11
700 1 _ |a Bergmann, Manuela
|b 12
700 1 _ |a Karakatsani, Anna
|b 13
700 1 _ |a Trichopoulou, Antonia
|b 14
700 1 _ |a Peppa, Heleni
|b 15
700 1 _ |a Agnoli, Claudia
|b 16
700 1 _ |a Santucci de Magistris, Maria
|b 17
700 1 _ |a Palli, Domenico
|b 18
700 1 _ |a Sacerdote, Carlotta
|b 19
700 1 _ |a Tumino, Rosario
|b 20
700 1 _ |a Gunter, Marc J
|b 21
700 1 _ |a Huybrechts, Inge
|b 22
700 1 _ |a Scalbert, Augustin
|b 23
773 _ _ |a 10.1093/ajcn/nqz222
|g p. nqz222
|0 PERI:(DE-600)1496439-9
|n 6
|p 1424-1433
|t The American journal of clinical nutrition
|v 110
|y 2019
|x 1938-3207
909 C O |p VDB
|o oai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:147241
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 9
|6 P:(DE-He78)0907a10ba1dc8f53f04907f54f6fdcfe
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 10
|6 P:(DE-He78)79ab945544e5bc017a2317b6146ed3aa
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|l Krebsforschung
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-310
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-313
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-300
|v Cancer risk factors and prevention
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|b Gesundheit
914 1 _ |y 2019
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b AM J CLIN NUTR : 2017
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310
|2 StatID
|b NCBI Molecular Biology Database
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0320
|2 StatID
|b PubMed Central
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1110
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Clinical Medicine
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1030
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Life Sciences
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
915 _ _ |a IF >= 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905
|2 StatID
|b AM J CLIN NUTR : 2017
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)C020-20160331
|k C020
|l Epidemiologie von Krebserkrankungen
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)C020-20160331
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21