001     147386
005     20240229123023.0
024 7 _ |a 10.2967/jnumed.119.231431
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a pmid:31653712
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a 0022-3123
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 0097-9058
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 0161-5505
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1535-5667
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2159-662X
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a altmetric:69416273
|2 altmetric
037 _ _ |a DKFZ-2019-02503
041 _ _ |a eng
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Rathke, Hendrik
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Response prediction of 177Lu-PSMA-617 RLT using PSA, Chromogranin A, and LDH.
260 _ _ |a New York, NY
|c 2020
|b Soc.
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1614087711_25875
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
500 _ _ |a 2020 May;61(5):689-695
520 _ _ |a Neuroendocrine-like trans-differentiation of prostate cancer adenocarcinomas correlates with serum levels of Chromogranin A (CgA) and drives treatment resistance. Aim of this work was to evaluate whether CgA could serve as a response predictor for 177Lu-PSMA617 radio-ligand therapy (PSMA-RLT) in comparison to the established tumor markers. Methods: 100 consecutive patients with metastasized castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) scheduled for PSMA-RLT were evaluated for prostate specific antigen (PSA), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and CgA at baseline and in follow-up of PSMA-RLT. Tumor-uptake of PSMA-ligand, a known predictive marker for response, was assessed as a control-variable. Results: From the 100 evaluated patients, 35 had partial remission (PR), 16 stable disease (SD), 15 mixed response (MR) and 36 progression of disease (PD). High tumor-uptake (above salivary gland uptake) translated into PR with an Odds Ratio (OR) of 60.265 (95%-CI 5.038-720.922). Elevated LDH implied a reduced chance for partial remission with an OR of 0.094 (95%-CI 0.017 - 0.518) but increases the frequency of progressive disease (OR 2.717, 95%-CI 1.391-5.304); All patients who achieved partial remission had a normal baseline LDH. Factor-2 elevation of CgA increased the risk for progression with an OR of 3.089 (95%-CI 1.302 - 7.332). Baseline PSA showed no significant odds. Conclusion: In our cohort baseline PSA had no prognostic value for response prediction. LDH was the marker with the strongest prognostic value and elevated LDH increased the risk for progression of disease under PSMA-RLT. Elevated CgA demonstrated moderate impact as a negative prognostic marker in general but was explicitly related with the presence of liver metastases. Well in line with literature, sufficient tumor uptake is a prerequisite to achieve tumor-response.
536 _ _ |a 319H - Addenda (POF3-319H)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-319H
|c POF3-319H
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed,
700 1 _ |a Holland-Letz, Tim
|0 P:(DE-He78)457c042884c901eb0a02c18bb1d30103
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Mier, Walter
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Flechsig, Paul
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Mavriopoulou, Eleni
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Röhrich, Manuel
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Kopka, Klaus
|0 P:(DE-He78)9793347ba83f527b81a22ab75af9378a
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Hohenfellner, Markus
|b 7
700 1 _ |a Giesel, Frederik L
|b 8
700 1 _ |a Haberkorn, Uwe A
|0 P:(DE-He78)13a0afba029f5f64dc18b25ef7499558
|b 9
|u dkfz
700 1 _ |a Kratochwil, Clemens
|b 10
773 _ _ |a 10.2967/jnumed.119.231431
|g p. jnumed.119.231431 -
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2040222-3
|n 5
|p 689-695
|t Journal of nuclear medicine
|v 61
|y 2020
|x 2159-662X
909 C O |p VDB
|o oai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:147386
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-He78)457c042884c901eb0a02c18bb1d30103
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 6
|6 P:(DE-He78)9793347ba83f527b81a22ab75af9378a
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 9
|6 P:(DE-He78)13a0afba029f5f64dc18b25ef7499558
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Gesundheit
|l Krebsforschung
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-310
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-319H
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-300
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Addenda
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2020
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b J NUCL MED : 2017
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310
|2 StatID
|b NCBI Molecular Biology Database
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0320
|2 StatID
|b PubMed Central
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1110
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Clinical Medicine
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1030
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Life Sciences
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
915 _ _ |a IF >= 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905
|2 StatID
|b J NUCL MED : 2017
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)C060-20160331
|k C060
|l C060 Biostatistik
|x 0
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)E030-20160331
|k E030
|l E030 Radiopharmazeutische Chemie
|x 1
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)E060-20160331
|k E060
|l E060 KKE Nuklearmedizin
|x 2
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)C060-20160331
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)E030-20160331
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)E060-20160331
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21