% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Pyczek:148820,
author = {J. Pyczek and N. Khizanishvili and M. Kuzyakova and S.
Zabel and J. Bauer and F. Nitzki and S. Emmert and M. P.
Schön and P. Boukamp$^*$ and H.-U. Schildhaus and A. Uhmann
and H. Hahn},
title = {{R}egulation and {R}ole of {GLI}1 in {C}utaneous {S}quamous
{C}ell {C}arcinoma {P}athogenesis.},
journal = {Frontiers in genetics},
volume = {10},
issn = {1664-8021},
address = {Lausanne},
publisher = {Frontiers Media},
reportid = {DKFZ-2020-00012},
pages = {1185},
year = {2019},
abstract = {Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is the second most
common skin tumor in humans. Although current therapies are
sufficient to clear the tumor in many cases, the overall
risk of cSCC metastasis is still $5\%.$ Alternative
treatment options could help to overcome this situation.
Here we focused on the role of the Hedgehog (HH) signaling
pathway and its interplay with epidermal growth factor
receptor (EGFR) signaling in cSCC. The analyses revealed
that, despite lack of Sonic HH (SHH) expression, a subset of
human cSCC can express GLI1, a marker for active HH
signaling, within distinct tumor areas. In contrast, all
tumors strongly express EGFR and the hair follicle stem cell
marker SOX9 at the highly proliferative tumor-stroma
interface, whereas central tumor regions with a more
differentiated stratum spinosum cell type lack both EGFR and
SOX9 expression. In vitro experiments indicate that
activation of EGFR signaling in the human cSCC cell lines
SCL-1, MET-1, and MET-4 leads to GLI1 inhibition via the
MEK/ERK axis without affecting cellular proliferation. Of
note, EGFR activation also inhibits cellular migration of
SCL-1 and MET-4 cells. Because proliferation and migration
of the cells is also not altered by a GLI1 knockdown, GLI1
is apparently not involved in processes of aggressiveness in
established cSCC tumors. In contrast, our data rather
suggest a negative correlation between Gli1 expression level
and cSCC formation because skin of Ptch +/- mice with
slightly elevated Gli1 expression levels is significantly
less susceptible to chemically-induced cSCC formation
compared to murine wildtype skin. Although not yet formally
validated, these data open the possibility that GLI1 (and
thus HH signaling) may antagonize cSCC initiation and is not
involved in cSCC aggressiveness, at least in a subset of
cSCC.},
cin = {A110},
ddc = {570},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)A110-20160331},
pnm = {311 - Signalling pathways, cell and tumor biology
(POF3-311)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-311},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:31867038},
pmc = {pmc:PMC6904360},
doi = {10.3389/fgene.2019.01185},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/148820},
}