guest ::
| Home > Publications database > Automatic Tumor Segmentation With a Convolutional Neural Network in Multiparametric MRI: Influence of Distortion Correction. > print |
| Home > Publications database > Automatic Tumor Segmentation With a Convolutional Neural Network in Multiparametric MRI: Influence of Distortion Correction. > print |
| 001 | 152998 | ||
| 005 | 20240229120021.0 | ||
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 10.18383/j.tom.2019.00010 |2 doi |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a pmid:31572790 |2 pmid |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a pmc:PMC6752289 |2 pmc |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 2379-1381 |2 ISSN |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 2379-139X |2 ISSN |
| 037 | _ | _ | |a DKFZ-2020-00095 |
| 041 | _ | _ | |a eng |
| 082 | _ | _ | |a 610 |
| 100 | 1 | _ | |a Bielak, Lars |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 0 |
| 245 | _ | _ | |a Automatic Tumor Segmentation With a Convolutional Neural Network in Multiparametric MRI: Influence of Distortion Correction. |
| 260 | _ | _ | |a Ann Arbor, Michigan |c 2019 |b Grapho Publications |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a article |2 DRIVER |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Output Types/Journal article |2 DataCite |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |b journal |m journal |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16 |s 1581516142_30989 |2 PUB:(DE-HGF) |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a ARTICLE |2 BibTeX |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE |2 ORCID |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |0 0 |2 EndNote |
| 520 | _ | _ | |a Precise tumor segmentation is a crucial task in radiation therapy planning. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are among the highest scoring automatic approaches for tumor segmentation. We investigate the difference in segmentation performance of geometrically distorted and corrected diffusion-weighted data using data of patients with head and neck tumors; 18 patients with head and neck tumors underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, including T2w, T1w, T2*, perfusion (ktrans), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements. Owing to strong geometrical distortions in diffusion-weighted echo planar imaging in the head and neck region, ADC data were additionally distortion corrected. To investigate the influence of geometrical correction, first 14 CNNs were trained on data with geometrically corrected ADC and another 14 CNNs were trained using data without the correction on different samples of 13 patients for training and 4 patients for validation each. The different sets were each trained from scratch using randomly initialized weights, but the training data distributions were pairwise equal for corrected and uncorrected data. Segmentation performance was evaluated on the remaining 1 test-patient for each of the 14 sets. The CNN segmentation performance scored an average Dice coefficient of 0.40 ± 0.18 for data including distortion-corrected ADC and 0.37 ± 0.21 for uncorrected data. Paired t test revealed that the performance was not significantly different (P = .313). Thus, geometrical distortion on diffusion-weighted imaging data in patients with head and neck tumor does not significantly impair CNN segmentation performance in use. |
| 536 | _ | _ | |a 899 - ohne Topic (POF3-899) |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-899 |c POF3-899 |f POF III |x 0 |
| 588 | _ | _ | |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed, |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Wiedenmann, Nicole |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 1 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Nicolay, Nils |0 P:(DE-He78)8d52e7ff1ccaac7dbf0232fdcb0168bd |b 2 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Lottner, Thomas |b 3 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Fischer, Johannes |b 4 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Bunea, Hatice |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 5 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Grosu, Anca-Ligia |b 6 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Bock, Michael |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 7 |
| 773 | _ | _ | |a 10.18383/j.tom.2019.00010 |g Vol. 5, no. 3, p. 292 - 299 |0 PERI:(DE-600)2857000-5 |n 3 |p 292 - 299 |t Tomography |v 5 |y 2019 |x 2379-139X |
| 909 | C | O | |p VDB |o oai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:152998 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum |0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0 |k DKFZ |b 0 |6 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum |0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0 |k DKFZ |b 1 |6 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum |0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0 |k DKFZ |b 2 |6 P:(DE-He78)8d52e7ff1ccaac7dbf0232fdcb0168bd |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum |0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0 |k DKFZ |b 5 |6 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum |0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0 |k DKFZ |b 7 |6 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
| 913 | 1 | _ | |a DE-HGF |b Programmungebundene Forschung |l ohne Programm |1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-890 |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-899 |2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-800 |v ohne Topic |x 0 |4 G:(DE-HGF)POF |3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3 |
| 914 | 1 | _ | |y 2019 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300 |2 StatID |b Medline |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199 |2 StatID |b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a WoS |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0112 |2 StatID |b Emerging Sources Citation Index |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150 |2 StatID |b Web of Science Core Collection |
| 920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-He78)L601-20160331 |k L601 |l DKTK Freiburg |x 0 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a journal |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a VDB |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-He78)L601-20160331 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a UNRESTRICTED |
| Library | Collection | CLSMajor | CLSMinor | Language | Author |
|---|