% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Karrasch:153782,
author = {S. Karrasch and A. Peters and C. Meisinger and M. Ferland
and L. Jaeschke and T. Pischon and J. Fricke and T. Keil and
S. Gastell and M. Schulze and M. Brandes and K. Günther and
O. Kuß and T. Schikowski and C. Emmel and K.-H. Jöckel and
K. B. Michels and C.-W. Franzke and S. Langer and R.
Mikolajczyk and A. Jagodzinski and H. Becher and S. Castell
and Y. Kemmling and S. Waniek and W. Lieb and K. Wirkner and
M. Loeffler and K. H. Greiser$^*$ and R. Kaaks$^*$ and N.
Legath and K. Berger and S. Schipf and W. Hoffmann and A.
Sedlmeier and M. Leitzmann and H. Brenner$^*$ and B.
Holleczek and H. Schulz},
title = {[{L}ung function in the {G}erman {N}ational {C}ohort:
methods and initial results].},
journal = {Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung,
Gesundheitsschutz},
volume = {63},
number = {3},
issn = {1437-1588},
address = {Heidelberg},
publisher = {Springer},
reportid = {DKFZ-2020-00448},
pages = {322-331},
year = {2020},
note = {2020 Mar;63(3):322-331},
abstract = {A nationwide assessment of the respiratory status on the
basis of standardized lung function measurements has so far
not been available in Germany. The present work describes
the lung function tests in the German National Cohort (GNC)
and presents initial results based on the GNC Midterm
Baseline Dataset.The assessment of lung function in the GNC
comprised spirometry (level 1) and the determination of
exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO, level 2). Our quality assurance
concept included regular training of lung function test
procedures at various GNC sites, interim evaluations of test
quality, as well as regular calibration/measurement checks
of test equipment. For spirometry, we established
a stepwise procedure for offline quality control based on
raw flow volume curves.In the present dataset
(n = 101,734), spirometry was available for 86,893 study
participants and FeNO was available for 15,228 participants.
The average (±SD) FEV1 Z score (according to GLI 2012) was
-0.321 ± 1.047, the FVC Z score was
-0.153 ± 0.941, and the FEV1/FVC Z score was
-0.337 ± 0.901. The difference in FEV1/FVC between
current smokers and never-smokers increased with age. The
average FeNO was 14.2 ÷ 2.0 ppb. Current smoking
reduced FeNO levels by $43\%,$ whereas respiratory allergy
increased FeNO levels by $16\%$ in nonsmokers.The results of
spirometry and the FeNO measurements are in the expected
range with regard to their distributions and correlates. The
GNC provides a valuable basis for future investigations of
respiratory health and its determinants as well as research
into the prevention of respiratory diseases in Germany.},
cin = {C020 / C070},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)C020-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)C070-20160331},
pnm = {313 - Cancer risk factors and prevention (POF3-313)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-313},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:32078705},
doi = {10.1007/s00103-020-03102-1},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/153782},
}