%0 Journal Article
%A Holtfreter, Birte
%A Samietz, Stefanie
%A Hertrampf, Katrin
%A Aarabi, Ghazal
%A Hagenfeld, Daniel
%A Kim, Ti-Sun
%A Kocher, Thomas
%A Koos, Bernd
%A Schmitter, Marc
%A Ahrens, Wolfgang
%A Alwers, Elizabeth
%A Becher, Heiko
%A Berger, Klaus
%A Brenner, Hermann
%A Damms-Machado, Antje
%A Ebert, Nina
%A Fischer, Beate
%A Franzke, Claus-Werner
%A Frölich, Stefanie
%A Greiser, Halina
%A Gies, Anton
%A Günther, Kathrin
%A Hassan, Lamiaa
%A Hoffmann, W.
%A Jaeschke, Lina
%A Keil, Thomas
%A Kemmling, Yvonne
%A Krause, Gérard
%A Krist, Lilian
%A Legath, Nicole
%A Lieb, Wolfgang
%A Leitzmann, Michael
%A Linseisen, Jakob
%A Loeffler, Markus
%A Meinke-Franze, Claudia
%A Michels, Karin B
%A Mikolajczyk, Rafael
%A Obi, Nadia
%A Peters, Annette
%A Pischon, Tobias
%A Schipf, Sabine
%A Schmidt, Börge
%A Völzke, Henry
%A Waniek, Sabina
%A Wigmann, Claudia
%A Wirkner, Kerstin
%A Schmidt, Carsten Oliver
%A Kühnisch, Jan
%A Rupf, Stefan
%T [Design and quality control of the oral health status examination in the German National Cohort (GNC)].
%J Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz
%V 63
%N 4
%@ 1437-1588
%C Heidelberg
%I Springer
%M DKFZ-2020-00562
%P 426-438
%D 2020
%Z 2020 Apr;63(4):426-438.
%X Caries and periodontitis are highly prevalent worldwide. Because detailed data on these oral diseases were collected within the framework of the German National Cohort (GNC), associations between oral and systemic diseases and conditions can be investigated.The study protocol for the oral examination was designed to ensure a comprehensive collection of dental findings by trained non-dental staff within a limited examination time. At the mid-term of the GNC baseline examination, a first quality evaluation was performed to check the plausibility of results and to propose measures to improve the data quality.A dental interview, saliva sampling and oral diagnostics were conducted. As part of the level‑1 examination, the number of teeth and prostheses were recorded. As part of the level‑2 examination, detailed periodontal, cariological and functional aspects were examined. All examinations were conducted by trained non-dental personnel. Parameters were checked for plausibility and variable distributions were descriptively analysed.Analyses included data of 57,967 interview participants, 56,913 level‑1 participants and 6295 level‑2 participants. Percentages of missing values for individual clinical parameters assessed in level 1 and level 2 ranged between 0.02 and 3.9
%F PUB:(DE-HGF)16
%9 Journal Article
%$ pmid:32166336
%R 10.1007/s00103-020-03107-w
%U https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/154101