% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Tian:154427,
author = {Y. Tian$^*$ and E. Kharazmi$^*$ and H. Brenner$^*$ and X.
Xu$^*$ and K. Sundquist and J. Sundquist and M. Fallah$^*$},
title = {{C}alculating {S}tarting {A}ge for {S}creening in
{R}elatives of {P}atients {W}ith {C}olorectal {C}ancer
{B}ased on {D}ata {F}rom {L}arge {N}ationwide {D}atasets.},
journal = {Gastroenterology},
volume = {159},
number = {1},
issn = {0016-5085},
address = {Philadelphia, Pa. [u.a.]},
publisher = {Saunders},
reportid = {DKFZ-2020-00755},
pages = {159-168.e3},
year = {2020},
note = {Volume 159, Issue 1, July 2020, Pages
159-168.e3#EA:C120#LA:C120#},
abstract = {Although colorectal cancer (CRC) screening guidelines
acknowledge the need for earlier screening for high-risk
individuals, such as those with family history of CRC, there
is limited information on how many years earlier these
high-risk individuals should be screened; current practice
is based on weak evidence. We aimed to provide risk-adapted
recommendations on starting age of CRC screening for
individuals with different family histories.We collected
data from nationwide family-cancer datasets in Sweden and
calculated risk-adapted starting ages of screening for
individuals with different family histories of CRC. Family
history was defined as a dynamic (time-dependent) variable
allowing for changes during the follow-up period of 1958
through 2015.During a follow up of 12,829,251 individuals
with genealogy information, 173,796 developed CRC. The
10-year cumulative risk for the average-risk population at
age 50 y (guideline-recommended age for screening) was
$0.44\%.$ Individuals with different family histories of CRC
attained this equivalent $0.44\%$ risk 3-32 y earlier than
their peers in the general population without such a family
history. For example, individuals with 1 affected
first-degree relative diagnosed before age 45 reached the
corresponding risk level 16 y earlier.We determined
risk-adapted starting ages of CRC screening for close or
distant relatives of patients with CRC, using high-quality
nationwide datasets. These findings might be used in
counselling individuals about the appropriate age to start
CRC screening, to optimize screening practice, and to
supplement guidelines for CRC screening.},
cin = {C120 / C070 / HD01},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)C120-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)C070-20160331 /
I:(DE-He78)HD01-20160331},
pnm = {313 - Cancer risk factors and prevention (POF3-313)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-313},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:32251666},
doi = {10.1053/j.gastro.2020.03.063},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/154427},
}