000154657 001__ 154657
000154657 005__ 20240229123109.0
000154657 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.14309/ctg.0000000000000169
000154657 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:32352678
000154657 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:80988148
000154657 037__ $$aDKFZ-2020-00918
000154657 041__ $$aeng
000154657 082__ $$a610
000154657 1001_ $$0P:(DE-He78)20dc4ad11ff465acf5b99f1e679e10b7$$aNiedermaier, Tobias$$b0$$eFirst author
000154657 245__ $$aImpact of Inadequate Bowel Cleansing on Colonoscopic Findings in Routine Screening Practice.
000154657 260__ $$aLondon$$bNature Publ. Group$$c2020
000154657 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000154657 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000154657 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1637071026_5623
000154657 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000154657 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000154657 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000154657 500__ $$a#EA:C070#LA:C070#
000154657 520__ $$aColonoscopy is an imperfect gold standard for detecting colorectal neoplasms because some proportion of adenomas may be missed, mainly small lesions. This proportion is expected to be higher in case of inadequate bowel cleansing, which is frequently seen in routine practice. We estimated the proportions of neoplasms that are in principle detectable by colonoscopy but might be missed in case of incomplete bowel preparation.For 8,193 participants of screening colonoscopy in South-Western Germany, recruited between 2005 and 2016, the prevalence and numbers of different findings were extracted from colonoscopy reports and compared according to the reported bowel preparation quality.Bowel preparation quality was reported as good, poor, or was unspecified in 30.3%, 11.1%, and 58.6% of colonoscopy records. Reported prevalences of nonadvanced adenomas (NAAs) were similar among participants with poor and unspecified bowel preparation quality but substantially lower than among participants with good bowel preparation (adjusted prevalence rate ratio [RR] 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.77-0.96). The differences were observed for proximal but not for distal NAAs (RRs 0.82, 95% CI: 0.71-0.95 and 0.95, 95% CI: 0.82-1.10).Our study suggests that a significant proportion of NAAs located in the proximal colon might be missed during colonoscopy if bowel cleansing is not adequate. Major efforts should be made to further facilitate and enhance high-quality bowel preparation in routine screening practice.
000154657 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-313$$a313 - Cancer risk factors and prevention (POF3-313)$$cPOF3-313$$fPOF III$$x0
000154657 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed,
000154657 7001_ $$0P:(DE-He78)6e02c183f41e45a5867dec393fb4616a$$aAmitay, Efrat$$b1
000154657 7001_ $$0P:(DE-He78)6d4d6a0e2d726f899086ca98cd560922$$aGies, Anton$$b2
000154657 7001_ $$0P:(DE-He78)f4e98340e600f7411886c21c7b778d36$$aWeigl, Korbinian$$b3
000154657 7001_ $$0P:(DE-He78)6c5d058b7552d071a7fa4c5e943fff0f$$aHoffmeister, Michael$$b4
000154657 7001_ $$0P:(DE-He78)90d5535ff896e70eed81f4a4f6f22ae2$$aBrenner, Hermann$$b5$$eLast author
000154657 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2581516-7$$a10.14309/ctg.0000000000000169$$gVol. 11, no. 4, p. e00169 -$$n4$$pe00169$$tClinical and translational gastroenterology$$v11$$x2155-384X$$y2020
000154657 909CO $$ooai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:154657$$pVDB
000154657 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)2036810-0$$6P:(DE-He78)20dc4ad11ff465acf5b99f1e679e10b7$$aDeutsches Krebsforschungszentrum$$b0$$kDKFZ
000154657 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)2036810-0$$6P:(DE-He78)6e02c183f41e45a5867dec393fb4616a$$aDeutsches Krebsforschungszentrum$$b1$$kDKFZ
000154657 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)2036810-0$$6P:(DE-He78)6d4d6a0e2d726f899086ca98cd560922$$aDeutsches Krebsforschungszentrum$$b2$$kDKFZ
000154657 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)2036810-0$$6P:(DE-He78)f4e98340e600f7411886c21c7b778d36$$aDeutsches Krebsforschungszentrum$$b3$$kDKFZ
000154657 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)2036810-0$$6P:(DE-He78)6c5d058b7552d071a7fa4c5e943fff0f$$aDeutsches Krebsforschungszentrum$$b4$$kDKFZ
000154657 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)2036810-0$$6P:(DE-He78)90d5535ff896e70eed81f4a4f6f22ae2$$aDeutsches Krebsforschungszentrum$$b5$$kDKFZ
000154657 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-313$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-310$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-300$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bGesundheit$$lKrebsforschung$$vCancer risk factors and prevention$$x0
000154657 9141_ $$y2020
000154657 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bCLIN TRANSL GASTROEN : 2017
000154657 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000154657 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000154657 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0310$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bNCBI Molecular Biology Database
000154657 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0320$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bPubMed Central
000154657 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0501$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ Seal
000154657 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0500$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ
000154657 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bDOAJ : Blind peer review
000154657 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNCNDNV$$2V:(DE-HGF)$$aCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs CC BY-NC-ND (No Version)$$bDOAJ
000154657 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List
000154657 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000154657 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000154657 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5
000154657 9202_ $$0I:(DE-He78)C070-20160331$$kC070$$lC070 Klinische Epidemiologie und Alternf.$$x0
000154657 9201_ $$0I:(DE-He78)HD01-20160331$$kHD01$$lDKTK HD zentral$$x0
000154657 9201_ $$0I:(DE-He78)C070-20160331$$kC070$$lC070 Klinische Epidemiologie und Alternf.$$x1
000154657 9201_ $$0I:(DE-He78)C120-20160331$$kC120$$lPräventive Onkologie$$x2
000154657 9200_ $$0I:(DE-He78)C070-20160331$$kC070$$lC070 Klinische Epidemiologie und Alternf.$$x0
000154657 980__ $$ajournal
000154657 980__ $$aVDB
000154657 980__ $$aI:(DE-He78)HD01-20160331
000154657 980__ $$aI:(DE-He78)C070-20160331
000154657 980__ $$aI:(DE-He78)C120-20160331
000154657 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED