% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Kartschmit:154695,
      author       = {N. Kartschmit and R. Sutcliffe and M. P. Sheldon and S.
                      Moebus and K. H. Greiser$^*$ and S. Hartwig and D. Thürkow
                      and U. Stentzel and N. van den Berg and K. Wolf and W. Maier
                      and A. Peters and S. Ahmed and C. Köhnke and R. Mikolajczyk
                      and A. Wienke and A. Kluttig and G. Rudge},
      title        = {{W}alkability and its association with walking/cycling and
                      body mass index among adults in different regions of
                      {G}ermany: a cross-sectional analysis of pooled data from
                      five {G}erman cohorts.},
      journal      = {BMJ open},
      volume       = {10},
      number       = {4},
      issn         = {2044-6055},
      address      = {London},
      publisher    = {BMJ Publishing Group},
      reportid     = {DKFZ-2020-00953},
      pages        = {e033941},
      year         = {2020},
      abstract     = {To examine three walkability measures (points of interest
                      (POI), transit stations and impedance (restrictions to
                      walking) within 640 m of participant's addresses) in
                      different regions in Germany and assess the relationships
                      between walkability, walking/cycling and body mass index
                      (BMI) using generalised additive models.Five different
                      regions and cities of Germany using data from five cohort
                      studies.For analysing walking/cycling behaviour, there were
                      6269 participants of a pooled sample from three cohorts with
                      a mean age of 59.2 years (SD: 14.3) and of them $48.9\%$
                      were male. For analysing BMI, there were 9441 participants
                      of a pooled sample of five cohorts with a mean age of 62.3
                      years (SD: 12.8) and of them $48.5\%$ were male.(1)
                      Self-reported walking/cycling (dichotomised into more than
                      30 min and 30 min and less per day; (2) BMI calculated
                      with anthropological measures from weight and height.Higher
                      impedance was associated with lower prevalence of
                      walking/cycling more than 30 min/day (prevalence ratio
                      (PR): 0.95; $95\%$ CI 0.93 to 0.97), while higher number of
                      POI and transit stations were associated with higher
                      prevalence (PR 1.03; $95\% CI$ 1.02 to 1.05 for both
                      measures). Higher impedance was associated with higher BMI
                      (ß: 0.15; $95\% CI$ 0.04 to 0.25) and a higher number of
                      POI with lower BMI (ß: -0.14; $95\% CI$ -0.24 to 0.04).
                      No association was found between transit stations and BMI
                      (ß: 0.005, $95\% CI$ -0.11 to 0.12). Stratified by cohort
                      we observed heterogeneous associations between BMI and
                      transit stations and impedance.We found evidence for
                      associations of walking/cycling with walkability measures.
                      Associations for BMI differed across cohorts.},
      cin          = {C020},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {I:(DE-He78)C020-20160331},
      pnm          = {313 - Cancer risk factors and prevention (POF3-313)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-313},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {pmid:32350013},
      doi          = {10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033941},
      url          = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/154695},
}