% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Schttler:157142,
author = {C. Schüttler and V. Huth and M. von Jagwitz-Biegnitz and
M. Lablans$^*$ and H.-U. Prokosch and L. Griebel},
title = {{U}sability {A}nalysis of the '{S}ample {L}ocator': a
{F}ederated {O}nline {S}earch {T}ool for {B}iospecimens.},
journal = {Journal of medical internet research},
volume = {22},
number = {8},
issn = {1438-8871},
address = {Richmond, Va.},
publisher = {Healthcare World},
reportid = {DKFZ-2020-01428},
pages = {e17739},
year = {2020},
note = {2020 Aug 18;22(8):e17739},
abstract = {The German Biobank Alliance (GBA) aims to establish a
cross-site biobank network. For this endeavor, the so-called
Sample Locator has been developed ‒ a federated
search-tool for biospecimens and related data ‒ forming
the heart of its IT infrastructure.To ensure the sustainable
use of such a tool, we included researchers as participants
in an end user based usability evaluation.To develop a
prototype ready for evaluation, we needed input from GBA IT
experts. Thus, we conducted a two-day workshop with eight
GBA IT team members. Focus was on the respective steps of a
user-centered design process. With the acquired knowledge,
the participants designed low fidelity mockups. The main
ideas of these mockups were discussed, extracted and
summarized into a comprehensive prototype using MS
PowerPoint. Furthermore, we created a questionnaire
concerning the usability of the prototype including the
System Usability Score (SUS), questions on negative/
positive aspects, and typical tasks to be fulfilled with the
tool. Subsequently, the prototype was pre-tested on basis of
this questionnaire with researchers having biobank
background. Based on this preliminary work, the usability
analysis was ultimately carried out with researchers and the
results were evaluated.Altogether 27 researchers familiar
with sample requests evaluated the prototype. The analysis
of the feedback certifies a good usability given the Sample
Locator prototype was seen as intuitive and user-friendly,
by $74\%$ of the participants. The total SUS score of 25
persons that completed the questionnaire is 80.4, indicating
good system usability. Still, the evaluation provided useful
advice on optimization potential, e.g. by offering a help
function.The findings of this usability analysis indicate
that the considerations regarding a user-friendly
application, which have been made in the development process
so far, strongly coincide with the perception of the study
participants. Nevertheless, it was important to engage
prospective end users to ensure that the previous
development is going in the desired direction and that the
Sample Locator will be used in the future. The user comments
and suggestions for improvement will be considered in
upcoming iterations for refinement.},
cin = {E260},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)E260-20160331},
pnm = {315 - Imaging and radiooncology (POF3-315)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-315},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:32663150},
doi = {10.2196/17739},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/157142},
}