% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Christakoudi:163026,
author = {S. Christakoudi and K. K. Tsilidis and D. C. Muller and H.
Freisling and E. Weiderpass and K. Overvad and S. Söderberg
and C. Häggström and T. Pischon and C. C. Dahm and J.
Zhang and A. Tjønneland and J. Halkjær and C. MacDonald
and M.-C. Boutron-Ruault and F. R. Mancini and T. Kühn$^*$
and R. Kaaks$^*$ and M. B. Schulze and A. Trichopoulou and
A. Karakatsani and E. Peppa and G. Masala and V. Pala and S.
Panico and R. Tumino and C. Sacerdote and J. R. Quirós and
A. Agudo and M.-J. Sánchez and L. Cirera and A.
Barricarte-Gurrea and P. Amiano and E. Memarian and E.
Sonestedt and B. Bueno-de-Mesquita and A. M. May and K.-T.
Khaw and N. J. Wareham and T. Y. N. Tong and I. Huybrechts
and H. Noh and E. K. Aglago and M. Ellingjord-Dale and H. A.
Ward and D. Aune and E. Riboli},
title = {{A} {B}ody {S}hape {I}ndex ({ABSI}) achieves better
mortality risk stratification than alternative indices of
abdominal obesity: results from a large {E}uropean cohort.},
journal = {Scientific reports},
volume = {10},
number = {1},
issn = {2045-2322},
address = {[London]},
publisher = {Macmillan Publishers Limited, part of Springer Nature},
reportid = {DKFZ-2020-01817},
pages = {14541},
year = {2020},
abstract = {Abdominal and general adiposity are independently
associated with mortality, but there is no consensus on how
best to assess abdominal adiposity. We compared the ability
of alternative waist indices to complement body mass index
(BMI) when assessing all-cause mortality. We used data from
352,985 participants in the European Prospective
Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) and Cox
proportional hazards models adjusted for other risk factors.
During a mean follow-up of 16.1 years, 38,178 participants
died. Combining in one model BMI and a strongly correlated
waist index altered the association patterns with mortality,
to a predominantly negative association for BMI and a
stronger positive association for the waist index, while
combining BMI with the uncorrelated A Body Shape Index
(ABSI) preserved the association patterns. Sex-specific
cohort-wide quartiles of waist indices correlated with BMI
could not separate high-risk from low-risk individuals
within underweight (BMI < 18.5 kg/m2) or obese
(BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) categories, while the highest
quartile of ABSI separated $18-39\%$ of the individuals
within each BMI category, which had $22-55\%$ higher risk of
death. In conclusion, only a waist index independent of BMI
by design, such as ABSI, complements BMI and enables
efficient risk stratification, which could facilitate
personalisation of screening, treatment and monitoring.},
cin = {C020},
ddc = {600},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)C020-20160331},
pnm = {313 - Cancer risk factors and prevention (POF3-313)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-313},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:32883969},
pmc = {pmc:PMC7471961},
doi = {10.1038/s41598-020-71302-5},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/163026},
}