% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Schmidt:163032,
author = {M. Schmidt$^*$ and S. Hermann$^*$ and V. Arndt$^*$ and K.
Steindorf$^*$},
title = {{P}revalence and severity of long-term physical, emotional,
and cognitive fatigue across 15 different cancer entities.},
journal = {Cancer medicine},
volume = {9},
number = {21},
issn = {2045-7634},
address = {Hoboken, NJ},
publisher = {Wiley},
reportid = {DKFZ-2020-01823},
pages = {8053-8061},
year = {2020},
note = {#EA:C110#LA:C110# 2020 Nov;9(21):8053-8061},
abstract = {Fatigue prevalence and severity have been assessed in a
variety of studies, yet, not in a standardized way, and
predominantly in breast cancer patients. Systematic,
comparative investigations across a broad range of cancer
entities are lacking.The FiX study systematically enrolled
2244 cancer patients across 15 entities approximately
2 years after diagnosis. Fatigue was assessed with the
multidimensional EORTC QLQ-FA12 questionnaire. Physical,
emotional, cognitive, and total fatigue were compared across
entities and with normative values of the general
population. Differences in patients' characteristics and
cancer therapy between entities were taken into account
using analyses of covariance models.Across all entities,
mean physical fatigue levels were significantly higher than
age- and sex-matched means of the general population for all
cancer entities (all Bonferroni-Holm adjusted P < .01).
For most entities also emotional and cognitive fatigue
levels were significantly higher than normative values. Age-
and sex-standardized physical fatigue prevalence ranged from
$31.8\%$ among prostate to $51.7\%$ among liver cancer
patients. Differences between entities could not be fully
explained by sex, age, BMI, or cancer therapy. Adjusted for
these factors, mean physical fatigue was higher for stomach
(P = .0004), lung (P = .034), kidney (P = .0011),
pancreas (P = .081), and endometrium (P = .022) compared
to breast cancer patients. Adjusted means of emotional
fatigue were also lowest in breast cancer patients and
significantly higher in stomach (P = .0047), bladder
(P = .0036), and rectal (P = .0020) cancer
patients.Physical, emotional, and cognitive fatigue is
prevalent in all 15 investigated cancer entities even
2 years after diagnosis. Fatigue in breast cancer patients,
the so-far most studied group, is in the lowest range among
all entities, suggesting that the extent of fatigue is still
insufficiently determined. Entity-specific problems might
need to be considered in the treatment of fatigue.},
cin = {C110 / M110 / C071},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)C110-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)M110-20160331 /
I:(DE-He78)C071-20160331},
pnm = {313 - Cancer risk factors and prevention (POF3-313)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-313},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:32893501},
doi = {10.1002/cam4.3413},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/163032},
}