% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{ChungHall:163167,
      author       = {J. Chung-Hall and G. T. Fong and G. Meng and L. V. Craig
                      and A. McNeill and S. C. Hitchman and E. Fernández and U.
                      Mons$^*$ and A. C. Trofor and K. Przewoźniak and W. A.
                      Zatoński and T. Demjén and P. A. Katsaounou and C. N.
                      Kyriakos and C. I. Vardavas and C. I. Vardavas and A. Glahn
                      and C. N. Kyriakos and D. Nguyen and K. Nikitara and C.
                      Radu-Loghin and P. Starchenko and A. Tsatsakis and C.
                      Girvalaki and C. Igoumenaki and S. Papadakis and A.
                      Papathanasaki and M. Tzatzarakis and A. I. Vardavas and N.
                      Bécuwe and L. Deaconu and S. Goudet and C. Hanley and O.
                      Rivière and T. Demjén and J. Kiss and A. P. Kovacs and E.
                      Fernández and Y. Castellano and M. Fu and S. O. Nogueira
                      and O. Tigova and A. McNeill and K. East And and S. C.
                      Hitchman and U. Mons$^*$ and S. Kahnert$^*$ and Y. Tountas
                      and P. Behrakis and F. T. Filippidis and C. Gratziou and P.
                      Katsaounou and T. Peleki and I. Petroulia and C. Tzavara and
                      A. C. Trofor and M. Eremia and L. Lotrean and F. Mihaltan
                      and G. Rohde and T. Asano and C. Cichon and A. Far and C.
                      Genton and M. Jessner and L. Hedman and C. Janson and A.
                      Lindberg and B. Maguire and S. Ravara and V. Vaccaro and B.
                      Ward and M. Willemsen and H. de Vries and K. Hummel and G.
                      E. Nagelhout and W. A. Zatoński and A. Herbeć and K.
                      Janik-Koncewicz and K. Przewoźniak and M. Zatoński and G.
                      T. Fong and T. K. Agar and P. Driezen and S. Gravely and A.
                      C. K. Quah and M. E. Thompson},
      collaboration = {E.-P. Consortium},
      title        = {{S}upport for e-cigarette policies among smokers in seven
                      {E}uropean countries: longitudinal findings from the 2016-18
                      {EUREST}-{PLUS} {ITC} {E}urope {S}urveys.},
      journal      = {European journal of public health},
      volume       = {30},
      number       = {$Supplement_3$},
      issn         = {1464-360X},
      address      = {Oxford [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Oxford Univ. Press},
      reportid     = {DKFZ-2020-01870},
      pages        = {iii68 - iii77},
      year         = {2020},
      abstract     = {The 2016 European Tobacco Products Directive (TPD) required
                      Member States (MS) to implement new regulations for
                      electronic cigarettes (ECs). We conducted a longitudinal
                      study to assess changes over 2 years in smokers' support for
                      EC policies and identify predictors of support in seven
                      European countries after TPD implementation.Prospective
                      cohort surveys were conducted among adult smokers in
                      Germany, Greece, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Spain and England
                      in 2016 (n = 9547; just after TPD) and 2018 (n = 10 287; 2
                      years after TPD). Multivariable logistic regression models
                      employing generalized estimating equations assessed changes
                      in support for four EC policies, and tested for country
                      differences and strength of key predictors of
                      support.Banning EC use in smoke-free places was supported by
                      $53.1\%$ in 2016 and $54.6\%$ in 2018 with a significant
                      increase in Greece $(51.7-66.0\%)$ and a decrease in Spain
                      $(60.1-48.6\%).$ Restricting EC/e-liquid nicotine content
                      was supported by 52.2 and $47.4\%$ in 2016 and 2018,
                      respectively, with a significant decrease in England
                      $(54.2-46.5\%)$ and Romania $(52.5-41.0\%).$ An EC promotion
                      ban was supported by 41.1 and $40.2\%.$ A flavour ban was
                      supported by $33.3\%$ and $32.3\%$ with a significant
                      increase in Hungary $(34.3-43.3\%).$ Support was generally
                      higher in Poland, Hungary and Greece vs. England. Support
                      was lower among dual and EC-only users, and low-income
                      smokers.Smokers in all countries strongly supported banning
                      EC use in smoke-free places and restricting nicotine content
                      after TPD implementation, with no clear trends for changes
                      in policy support.},
      cin          = {M050},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {I:(DE-He78)M050-20160331},
      pnm          = {319H - Addenda (POF3-319H)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-319H},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {pmid:32918824},
      doi          = {10.1093/eurpub/ckaa085},
      url          = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/163167},
}