% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Knoll:164057,
author = {M. Knoll$^*$ and J. Furkel$^*$ and J. Debus$^*$ and A.
Abdollahi$^*$ and A. Karch and C. Stock$^*$},
title = {{A}n {R} package for an integrated evaluation of
statistical approaches to cancer incidence projection.},
journal = {BMC medical research methodology},
volume = {20},
number = {1},
issn = {1471-2288},
address = {Heidelberg},
publisher = {Springer},
reportid = {DKFZ-2020-02225},
pages = {257},
year = {2020},
note = {#EA:E050#LA:C070#},
abstract = {Projection of future cancer incidence is an important task
in cancer epidemiology. The results are of interest also for
biomedical research and public health policy.
Age-Period-Cohort (APC) models, usually based on long-term
cancer registry data (> 20 yrs), are established for such
projections. In many countries (including Germany), however,
nationwide long-term data are not yet available. General
guidance on statistical approaches for projections using
rather short-term data is challenging and software to enable
researchers to easily compare approaches is lacking.To
enable a comparative analysis of the performance of
statistical approaches to cancer incidence projection, we
developed an R package (incAnalysis), supporting in
particular Bayesian models fitted by Integrated Nested
Laplace Approximations (INLA). Its use is demonstrated by an
extensive empirical evaluation of operating characteristics
(bias, coverage and precision) of potentially applicable
models differing by complexity. Observed long-term data from
three cancer registries (SEER-9, NORDCAN, Saarland) was used
for benchmarking.Overall, coverage was high (mostly >
$90\%)$ for Bayesian APC models (BAPC), whereas less complex
models showed differences in coverage dependent on
projection-period. Intercept-only models yielded values
below $20\%$ for coverage. Bias increased and precision
decreased for longer projection periods (> 15 years) for all
except intercept-only models. Precision was lowest for
complex models such as BAPC models, generalized additive
models with multivariate smoothers and generalized linear
models with age x period interaction effects.The incAnalysis
R package allows a straightforward comparison of cancer
incidence rate projection approaches. Further detailed and
targeted investigations into model performance in addition
to the presented empirical results are recommended to derive
guidance on appropriate statistical projection methods in a
given setting.},
cin = {E050 / E210 / HD01 / C070},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)E050-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)E210-20160331 /
I:(DE-He78)HD01-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)C070-20160331},
pnm = {313 - Cancer risk factors and prevention (POF3-313)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-313},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:33059585},
doi = {10.1186/s12874-020-01133-5},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/164057},
}