% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Hassan:164171,
author = {L. Hassan and D. Medenwald and D. Tiller and A. Kluttig and
B. Ludwig-Kraus and F. B. Kraus and K. H. Greiser$^*$ and R.
Mikolajczyk},
title = {{T}he association between change of soluble tumor necrosis
factor receptor {R}1 (s{TNF}-{R}1) measurements and
cardiovascular and all-cause mortality-{R}esults from the
population-based ({C}ardiovascular {D}isease, {L}iving and
{A}geing in {H}alle) {CARLA} study 2002-2016.},
journal = {PLOS ONE},
volume = {15},
number = {10},
issn = {1932-6203},
address = {San Francisco, California, US},
publisher = {PLOS},
reportid = {DKFZ-2020-02300},
pages = {e0241213 -},
year = {2020},
abstract = {Single measurements of higher levels of soluble tumor
necrosis factor receptor I (sTNF-R1) have been shown to be
associated with increased risk of mortality. However, up to
date, little is known about the underlying temporal dynamics
of sTNF-R1 concentrations and their relation with mortality.
We aimed to characterize the effect of changes in sTNFR-1
levels on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality,
independent from other established risk factors for
mortality, including other inflammatory markers.We used data
of the population based cohort study CARLA and included 1408
subjects with sTNF-R1 measured at baseline (2002-2006) and
first follow-up (2007-2010). Cox proportional hazard models
were used to assess the association of baseline and
follow-up sTNF-R1 measurements with all-cause and
cardiovascular mortality during ~10 years since the first
follow-up after adjusting for relevant confounders.Based on
211 deaths among 1408 subjects, per each doubling of the
baseline sTNF-R1, the risk of all-cause mortality was
increased by about $30\%$ (Hazard ratio 1.28, $95\%$
Confidence Interval 0.6-2.7), while per each doubling of the
follow-up level of sTNF-R1 mortality was 3-fold (3.11,
1.5-6.5) higher in a model including both measurements and
adjusting for confounders. The results were mainly related
to the cardiovascular mortality (5.9, 2.1-16.8 per each
doubling of follow up sTNF-R1 value).Solely the follow-up
value, rather than its change from baseline, predicted
future mortality. Thus, while sTNF-R1 levels are associated
with mortality, particularly cardiovascular, over a
long-time period in the general population, if they change,
the earlier measurements play no or little role.},
cin = {C020},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)C020-20160331},
pnm = {323 - Metabolic Dysfunction as Risk Factor (POF3-323)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-323},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:33104754},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0241213},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/164171},
}