% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Anderson:165935,
author = {C. L. Anderson and U. Mons$^*$ and V. Winkler},
title = {{G}lobal progress in tobacco control: the question of
policy compliance.},
journal = {Global health action},
volume = {13},
number = {1},
issn = {1654-9880},
address = {Abingdon},
publisher = {Taylor $\&$ Francis Group},
reportid = {DKFZ-2020-02486},
pages = {1844977},
year = {2020},
abstract = {Background: Currently, about $65\%$ of the world's
population is covered by at least one MPOWER tobacco control
policy measure. The impact of such policies might rely on
policy compliance. Objective: This study aims to describe
and compare global trends in legislation and compliance of
the following three tobacco control policies between 2009
and 2019: direct advertisement, promotion and sponsorship,
and smoke-free environments. Method: Data from the six most
recent WHO Tobacco Control (2009-2019) reports were used to
show the development of and possible associations between
legislated policies and policy compliance. Data pertaining
to the three indicators direct advertisement, promotion and
sponsorship, and smoke-free environments were collected and
analysed per country income category, according to the
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. For
each country, we (i) calculated the legislation describing
the situation according to the law as a percentage of
fulfilled MPOWER measurements and (ii) present the level of
compliance (ranging from 0 to 10) for the corresponding
policy. Results: Both tobacco control policy legislation and
compliance for direct advertising improved worldwide -
between 2009 and 2019 the median increased from $37.5\%$ to
$87.5\%$ for policy and from 5 to 8 for compliance. In
contrast, promotion and sponsorship restrictions hardly
developed since 2011 and are especially weak among low- and
middle-income countries. With respect to smoke-free
environments, global policy legislation increased steadily
over time while the relative compliance hardly increased. In
2019 data did not show significant correlations between
policy legislation and compliance: direct advertising
ρ = -0.003, p = 0.970; promotion and sponsorship
ρ = 0.140, p = 0.107; smoke-free environments
ρ = 0.158, p = 0.070. Conclusion: There is a clear need
to understand the barriers in achieving tobacco control
policy compliance and to routinely collect and incorporate
data on compliance in research in order to generate a more
reliable basis for further improvements in tobacco control.},
cin = {M050},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)M050-20160331},
pnm = {319H - Addenda (POF3-319H)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-319H},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:33190609},
doi = {10.1080/16549716.2020.1844977},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/165935},
}