001     166554
005     20240229123231.0
024 7 _ |a 10.3390/molecules25245811
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a pmid:33317120
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a altmetric:95711809
|2 altmetric
037 _ _ |a DKFZ-2020-02997
041 _ _ |a eng
082 _ _ |a 540
100 1 _ |a Silva, Valdemir C
|0 0000-0002-2069-2812
|b 0
245 _ _ |a New Insights for Red Propolis of Alagoas-Chemical Constituents, Topical Membrane Formulations and Their Physicochemical and Biological Properties.
260 _ _ |a Basel
|c 2020
|b MDPI44576
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1609332822_28516
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a The main objectives of this study were to evaluate the chemical constitution and allergenic potential of red propolis extract (RPE). They were evaluated, using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and the release of β-hexosaminidase, respectively. A plethora of biologically active polyphenols and the absence of allergic responses were evinced. RPE inhibited the release of β-hexosaminidase, suggesting that the extract does not stimulate allergic responses. Additionally, the physicochemical properties and antibacterial activity of hydrogel membranes loaded with RPE were analyzed. Bio-polymeric hydrogel membranes (M) were obtained using 5% carboxymethylcellulose (M1 and M2), 1.0% of citric acid (M3) and 10% RPE (for all). Their characterization was performed using thermal analysis, Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), total phenolic content, phenol release test and, antioxidant activity through 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical (DPPH) and Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP). The latter appointed to the similar antioxidant capacity of the M1, M2 and M3. The degradation profiles showed higher thermostability to M3, followed by M2 and M1. The incorporation of RPE into the matrices and the crosslinking of M3 were evinced by FTIR. There were differences in the release of phenolic compounds, with a higher release related to M1 and lower in the strongly crosslinked M3. The degradation profiles showed higher thermostability to M3, followed by M2 and M1. The antibacterial activity of the membranes was determined using the disc diffusion assay, in comparison with controls, obtained in the same way, without RPE. The membranes elicited antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis, with superior performance over M3. The hydrogel membranes loaded with RPE promote a physical barrier against bacterial skin infections and may be applied in the wound healing process.
536 _ _ |a 313 - Cancer risk factors and prevention (POF3-313)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-313
|c POF3-313
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed,
650 _ 7 |a allergenic activity
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a anti-staphylococcal
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a biopolymer
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a chromatographic profile
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a phytochemical screening
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a sodium carboxymethylcellulose
|2 Other
700 1 _ |a Silva, Abiane M G S
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Basílio, Jacqueline A D
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Xavier, Jadriane A
|0 0000-0002-2878-5589
|b 3
700 1 _ |a do Nascimento, Ticiano G
|0 0000-0002-3856-8764
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Naal, Rose M Z G
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Del Lama, Maria Perpetua
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Leonelo, Laila A D
|b 7
700 1 _ |a Mergulhão, Naianny L O N
|b 8
700 1 _ |a Maranhão, Fernanda C A
|0 0000-0002-4255-6563
|b 9
700 1 _ |a Silva, Denise M W
|0 0000-0001-9641-4264
|b 10
700 1 _ |a Owen, Robert
|0 P:(DE-He78)43996fb100428b0d99e233c3261f7187
|b 11
700 1 _ |a Duarte, Ilza F B
|0 0000-0003-0299-1007
|b 12
700 1 _ |a Bulhões, Laisa C G
|b 13
700 1 _ |a Basílio, Irinaldo D
|b 14
700 1 _ |a Goulart, Marília O F
|0 0000-0001-9860-3667
|b 15
773 _ _ |a 10.3390/molecules25245811
|g Vol. 25, no. 24, p. 5811 -
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2008644-1
|n 24
|p 5811
|t Molecules
|v 25
|y 2020
|x 1420-3049
909 C O |o oai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:166554
|p VDB
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Gesundheit
|l Krebsforschung
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-310
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-313
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-300
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Cancer risk factors and prevention
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2020
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b MOLECULES : 2018
|d 2020-08-26
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2020-08-26
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2020-08-26
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0320
|2 StatID
|b PubMed Central
|d 2020-08-26
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ Seal
|d 2020-08-26
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
|d 2020-08-26
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ : Blind peer review
|d 2020-08-26
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY (No Version)
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNV
|2 V:(DE-HGF)
|b DOAJ
|d 2020-08-26
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
|d 2020-08-26
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
|d 2020-08-26
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2020-08-26
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2020-08-26
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1150
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences
|d 2020-08-26
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2020-08-26
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2020-08-26
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
|d 2020-08-26
915 _ _ |a Article Processing Charges
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0561
|2 StatID
|d 2020-08-26
915 _ _ |a Fees
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0700
|2 StatID
|d 2020-08-26
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)C120-20160331
|k C120
|l Präventive Onkologie
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)C120-20160331
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21