Home > Publications database > Dietary ethanol extract of mango increases antioxidant activity of pork. > print

001     167450
005     20240229133540.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1016/j.animal.2020.100099
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a pmid:33573964
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a 1751-7311
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1751-732X
|2 ISSN
037 _ _ |a DKFZ-2021-00354
041 _ _ |a eng
082 _ _ |a 590
100 1 _ |a Araújo, L. R. S.
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Dietary ethanol extract of mango increases antioxidant activity of pork.
260 _ _ |a Cambridge
|c 2021
|b Cambridge Univ. Press
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1619614136_10127
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
500 _ _ |a 2021 Feb;15(2):100099
520 _ _ |a Ethanol extract of mango seeds (EEMS) are composed of several polyphenolic compounds with considerable in vitro antioxidant activity that can be used in pig feed and may contribute positively to meat quality characteristics. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of EEMS as a source of antioxidants in growing-finishing pig diets on meat quality, lipid stability, sulfhydryl groups non-proteinaceous (SG-NP), total phenolic compounds, total antioxidant potential and total antioxidant activity of meat after 1 and 7 days of refrigeration storage. Thirty-two (60-day-old) barrows, weighing 20.20 ± 1.34 kg, were used in a randomized block design consisting of eight animals with four treatment regimens. Treatments consisted of: Control = no dietary antioxidant; butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) = diet with 200 ppm BHT; EEMS200 = diet with 200 ppm EEMS; EEMS400 = diet with 400 ppm EEMS. At 145 days of age and average weight of 95.47 ± 6.19 kg, the animals were slaughtered and loin samples were collected and frozen before for qualitative analysis and evaluation of the effect of subsequent storage for 1 or 7 days at 8 °C on lipid stability, SG-NP, phenolic compounds, total antioxidant capacity and total antioxidant activity Meat from animals fed EEMS400 diet showed lower cooking loss (P < 0.0001) and higher non-protein sulfhydryl groups, phenolic compounds and total antioxidant activity at both 1 and 7 days of storage (P < 0.0001) compared to the other treatments. Greater antioxidant capacity was observed at 1 day storage in the meat of animals that consumed EEMS regardless of concentration when compared to the control group (P < 0.01). The dietary inclusion of EEMS to pig diets is more effective at 400 ppm in improving meat quality after cooking and antioxidant parameters of pork.
536 _ _ |a 313 - Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention (POF4-313)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313
|c POF4-313
|x 0
|f POF IV
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed,
650 _ 7 |a Mangifera indica
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a Mangiferin
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a Meat quality
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a Phenolic compounds
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a Reduced glutathione
|2 Other
700 1 _ |a Watanabe, P. H.
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Fernandes, D. R.
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Maia, I R de O
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Silva, E C da
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Pinheiro, R. R. S.
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Melo, M C A de
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Santos, E O Dos
|b 7
700 1 _ |a Owen, R. W.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 8
700 1 _ |a Trevisan, M. T. S.
|b 9
700 1 _ |a Freitas, E. R.
|b 10
773 _ _ |a 10.1016/j.animal.2020.100099
|g p. 100099 -
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2365209-3
|n 2
|p 100099
|t Animal
|v 15
|y 2021
|x 1751-7311
909 C O |o oai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:167450
|p VDB
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 8
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
913 0 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Gesundheit
|l Krebsforschung
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-310
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-313
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-300
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Cancer risk factors and prevention
|x 0
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Gesundheit
|l Krebsforschung
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-310
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-300
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2021
915 _ _ |a Allianz-Lizenz / DFG
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0400
|2 StatID
|d 2020-09-29
|w ger
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
|d 2020-09-29
|w ger
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b ANIMAL : 2018
|d 2020-09-29
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2020-09-29
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2020-09-29
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2020-09-29
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2020-09-29
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
|d 2020-09-29
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1060
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
|d 2020-09-29
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1190
|2 StatID
|b Biological Abstracts
|d 2020-09-29
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2020-09-29
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2020-09-29
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
|d 2020-09-29
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)C120-20160331
|k C120
|l Präventive Onkologie
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)C120-20160331
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED

LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21