% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Linseisen:167589,
author = {J. Linseisen and N. Grundmann and D. Zoller$^*$ and T.
Kuehn$^*$ and E. H. J. M. Jansen and V. Chajes and V.
Fedirko and E. Weiderpass and C. C. Dahm and K. Overvad and
A. Tjonneland and M.-C. Boutron-Ruault and J. A. Rothwell
and G. Severi and R. Kaaks and M. B. Schulze and K.
Aleksandrova and S. Sieri and S. Panico and R. Tumino and G.
Masala and L. De Marco and B. Bueno-de-Mesquita and R.
Vermeulen and I. T. Gram and G. Skeie and M.-D. Chirlaque
and E. Ardanaz and A. Agudo and M.-J. Sánchez and P. Amiano
and M. Wennberg and S. Bodén and A. Perez-Cornago and E. K.
Aglago and M. J. Gunter and M. Jenab and A. K. Heath and A.
Nieters},
title = {{R}ed blood cell fatty acids and risk of colorectal cancer
in the {E}uropean {P}rospective {I}nvestigation into
{C}ancer and {N}utrition ({EPIC}).},
journal = {Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers $\&$ prevention},
volume = {30},
number = {5},
issn = {1538-7755},
address = {Philadelphia, Pa.},
publisher = {AACR},
reportid = {DKFZ-2021-00449},
pages = {874-885},
year = {2021},
note = {30(5):874-885},
abstract = {A growing body of evidence suggests that alterations of
dietary fatty acid (FA) profiles are associated with
colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. However, data from large-scale
epidemiological studies using circulating FA measurements to
objectively assess individual FA and FA categories are
scarce.To investigate the association between red blood cell
(RBC) membrane FAs and risk of CRC in a case-control study
nested within a large prospective cohort. After a median
follow-up of 6.4 years, 1069 incident CRC cases were
identified and matched to 1069 controls among participants
of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and
Nutrition (EPIC). The FA composition of RBC phospholipids
(in $mol\%)$ was analyzed by gas chromatography, and their
association with risk of CRC was estimated by multivariable
adjusted conditional logistic regression models.After
correction for multiple testing, subjects with higher
concentrations of RBC stearic acid were at higher risk for
CRC (OR=1.23; $95\%$ CI=1.07-1.42, per 1 $mol\%).$
Conversely, CRC incidence decreased with increasing
proportions of RBC n-3 PUFA, particularly eicosapentaenoic
acid (0.75; 0.62-0.92, per 1 $mol\%).$ The findings for the
n-6 PUFA arachidonic acid were inconsistent.The positive
association between pre-diagnostic RBC stearic acid and CRC
reflects putative differences in FA intake and metabolism
between cancer cases and matched controls which deserve
further investigation. The inverse relationship between EPA
and CRC is in line with the repeatedly reported protective
effect of fish consumption on CRC risk.These findings add to
the evidence on CRC prevention.},
cin = {C020},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)C020-20160331},
pnm = {313 - Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention (POF4-313)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:33619024},
doi = {10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-1426},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/167589},
}