% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Nguyen:168122,
      author       = {M. T. N. Nguyen$^*$ and D. C. Laetsch$^*$ and L.-J.
                      Chen$^*$ and B. Holleczek and A. D. Meid and H. Brenner$^*$
                      and B. Schöttker$^*$},
      title        = {{C}omparison of {F}ive {L}ists to {I}dentify {P}otentially
                      {I}nappropriate {U}se of {N}on-{S}teroidal
                      {A}nti-{I}nflammatory {D}rugs in {O}lder {A}dults.},
      journal      = {Pain medicine},
      volume       = {22},
      number       = {9},
      issn         = {1526-4637},
      address      = {Oxford},
      publisher    = {Oxford University Press},
      reportid     = {DKFZ-2021-00690},
      pages        = {1962-1969},
      year         = {2021},
      note         = {#EA:C070#LA:C070# / 2021 Sep 8;22(9):1962-1969},
      abstract     = {To compare the prevalence of potentially inappropriate
                      non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) among NSAIDs
                      users defined with frequently used potentially inappropriate
                      medication (PIM) lists and to identify the determinants of
                      their use.Cross-sectional survey among community-dwelling
                      older adults from Germany.N = 284 NSAIDs users aged 65-89
                      years.All currently regularly or as-needed used drugs were
                      recorded during a home visit. Multivariate logistic
                      regression models were applied to assess the potential
                      determinants of potentially inappropriate NSAIDs
                      use.Prevalence of potentially inappropriate NSAIDs use was
                      $54.2\%,$ $45.4\%,$ $29.9\%,$ $20.4\%,$ and $3.5\%$ when
                      applying the STOPP, 2019 Beers, EU(7)-PIM, FORTA, and
                      PRISCUS list, respectively. No study participant was
                      identified as a potentially inappropriate NSAIDs user by all
                      five lists simultaneously. The majority $(68\%)$ were
                      identified only by one or two lists. Merely the STOPP and
                      Beers criteria had a moderate inter-instrument agreement.
                      Lower pain severity, gout, peptic ulcer (PU), cardiovascular
                      disease (CVD), and chronic kidney disease (CKD) were
                      statistically significantly associated with potentially
                      inappropriate NSAIDs use defined by the STOPP criteria and
                      the latter three conditions also with the 2019 Beers
                      criteria.The STOPP and Beers criteria may be superior to the
                      other lists because they more frequently identify
                      potentially inappropriate NSAIDs use in conditions implying
                      a high risk for NSAIDs' adverse events (i.e., PUD, CKD and
                      CVD). We developed a harmonized, country-independent PIM
                      list for NSAIDs with the same advantages as observed for the
                      STOOP and 2019 Beers criteria and recommended its use.},
      keywords     = {NSAIDs (Other) / Non-Steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs
                      (Other) / Pain (Other) / Potentially Inappropriate
                      Medication (Other) / Survey (Other)},
      cin          = {C070},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {I:(DE-He78)C070-20160331},
      pnm          = {313 - Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention (POF4-313)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {pmid:33749754},
      doi          = {10.1093/pm/pnaa480},
      url          = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/168122},
}