% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Matta:168394,
author = {M. Matta and I. Huybrechts and C. Biessy and C. Casagrande
and S. Yammine and A. Fournier and K. S. Olsen and M. Lukic
and I. T. Gram and E. Ardanaz and M.-J. Sánchez and L.
Dossus and R. T. Fortner$^*$ and B. Srour$^*$ and F.
Jannasch and M. B. Schulze and P. Amiano and A. Agudo and S.
Colorado-Yohar and J. R. Quirós and R. Tumino and S. Panico
and G. Masala and V. Pala and C. Sacerdote and A.
Tjønneland and A. Olsen and C. C. Dahm and A. H. Rosendahl
and S. Borgquist and M. Wennberg and A. K. Heath and D. Aune
and J. Schmidt and E. Weiderpass and V. Chajes and M. J.
Gunter and N. Murphy},
title = {{D}ietary intake of trans fatty acids and breast cancer
risk in 9 {E}uropean countries.},
journal = {BMC medicine},
volume = {19},
number = {1},
issn = {1741-7015},
address = {Heidelberg [u.a.]},
publisher = {Springer},
reportid = {DKFZ-2021-00881},
pages = {81},
year = {2021},
abstract = {Trans fatty acids (TFAs) have been hypothesised to
influence breast cancer risk. However, relatively few
prospective studies have examined this relationship, and
well-powered analyses according to hormone receptor-defined
molecular subtypes, menopausal status, and body size have
rarely been conducted.In the European Prospective
Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC), we
investigated the associations between dietary intakes of
TFAs (industrial trans fatty acids [ITFAs] and ruminant
trans fatty acids [RTFAs]) and breast cancer risk among
318,607 women. Multivariable hazard ratios (HRs) and $95\%$
confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using Cox
proportional hazards models, adjusted for other breast
cancer risk factors.After a median follow-up of 8.1 years,
13,241 breast cancer cases occurred. In the
multivariable-adjusted model, higher total ITFA intake was
associated with elevated breast cancer risk (HR for highest
vs lowest quintile, 1.14, $95\%$ CI 1.06-1.23; P trend =
0.001). A similar positive association was found between
intake of elaidic acid, the predominant ITFA, and breast
cancer risk (HR for highest vs lowest quintile, 1.14, $95\%$
CI 1.06-1.23; P trend = 0.001). Intake of total RTFAs was
also associated with higher breast cancer risk (HR for
highest vs lowest quintile, 1.09, $95\%$ CI 1.01-1.17; P
trend = 0.015). For individual RTFAs, we found positive
associations with breast cancer risk for dietary intakes of
two strongly correlated fatty acids (Spearman correlation r
= 0.77), conjugated linoleic acid (HR for highest vs lowest
quintile, 1.11, $95\%$ CI 1.03-1.20; P trend = 0.001) and
palmitelaidic acid (HR for highest vs lowest quintile, 1.08,
$95\%$ CI 1.01-1.16; P trend = 0.028). Similar associations
were found for total ITFAs and RTFAs with breast cancer risk
according to menopausal status, body mass index, and breast
cancer subtypes.These results support the hypothesis that
higher dietary intakes of ITFAs, in particular elaidic acid,
are associated with elevated breast cancer risk. Due to the
high correlation between conjugated linoleic acid and
palmitelaidic acid, we were unable to disentangle the
positive associations found for these fatty acids with
breast cancer risk. Further mechanistic studies are needed
to identify biological pathways that may underlie these
associations.},
keywords = {Breast cancer (Other) / Diet (Other) / Industrial trans
fatty acids (Other) / Ruminant trans fatty acids (Other)},
cin = {C020},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)C020-20160331},
pnm = {313 - Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention (POF4-313)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:33781249},
pmc = {pmc:PMC8008592},
doi = {10.1186/s12916-021-01952-3},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/168394},
}