guest ::
| Home > Publications database > Second-generation colon capsule endoscopy for detection of colorectal polyps: Systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials. > print |
| Home > Publications database > Second-generation colon capsule endoscopy for detection of colorectal polyps: Systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials. > print |
| 001 | 168404 | ||
| 005 | 20240229133607.0 | ||
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 10.1055/a-1353-4849 |2 doi |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a pmid:33860073 |2 pmid |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a pmc:PMC8041571 |2 pmc |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 2196-9736 |2 ISSN |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 2364-3722 |2 ISSN |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a altmetric:103801314 |2 altmetric |
| 037 | _ | _ | |a DKFZ-2021-00888 |
| 041 | _ | _ | |a English |
| 082 | _ | _ | |a 610 |
| 100 | 1 | _ | |a Möllers, Tobias |0 P:(DE-He78)6cc3cc35505b446fde081e7cd89a4b87 |b 0 |e First author |u dkfz |
| 245 | _ | _ | |a Second-generation colon capsule endoscopy for detection of colorectal polyps: Systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials. |
| 260 | _ | _ | |a Stuttgart |c 2021 |b Thieme |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a article |2 DRIVER |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Output Types/Journal article |2 DataCite |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |b journal |m journal |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16 |s 1618986452_3170 |2 PUB:(DE-HGF) |x Review Article |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a ARTICLE |2 BibTeX |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE |2 ORCID |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |0 0 |2 EndNote |
| 500 | _ | _ | |a #EA:C070# |
| 520 | _ | _ | |a Background and study aims Adherence to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is still unsatisfactory in many countries, thereby limiting prevention of CRC. Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE), a minimally invasive procedure, could be an alternative to fecal immunochemical tests or optical colonoscopy for CRC screening, and might increase adherence in CRC screening. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of CCE compared to optical colonoscopy (OC) as the gold standard, adequacy of bowel preparation regimes and the patient perspective on diagnostic measures. Methods We conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Register for Clinical Trials. Pooled estimates for sensitivity, specificity and the diagnostic odds ratio with their respective 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for studies providing sufficient data. Results Of 840 initially identified studies, 13 were included in the systematic review and up to 9 in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivities and specificities for polyps ≥ 6 mm were 87 % (95 % CI: 83 %-90 %) and 87 % (95 % CI: 76 %-93 %) in 8 studies, respectively. For polyps ≥ 10 mm, the pooled estimates for sensitivities and specificities were 87 % (95 % CI: 83 %-90 %) and 95 % (95 % CI: 92 %-97 %) in 9 studies, respectively. A patients' perspective was assessed in 31 % (n = 4) of studies, and no preference of CCE over OC was reported. Bowel preparation was adequate in 61 % to 92 % of CCE exams. Conclusions CCE provides high diagnostic accuracy in an adequately cleaned large bowel. Conclusive findings on patient perspectives require further studies to increase acceptance/adherence of CCE for CRC screening. |
| 536 | _ | _ | |a 313 - Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention (POF4-313) |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313 |c POF4-313 |x 0 |f POF IV |
| 588 | _ | _ | |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed, , Journals: inrepo01.inet.dkfz-heidelberg.de |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Schwab, Matthias |0 P:(DE-He78)0321c153233e619c095d93d9d5546c9d |b 1 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Gildein, Lisa |b 2 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Hoffmeister, Michael |0 P:(DE-He78)6c5d058b7552d071a7fa4c5e943fff0f |b 3 |u dkfz |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Albert, Jörg |b 4 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Brenner, Hermann |0 P:(DE-He78)90d5535ff896e70eed81f4a4f6f22ae2 |b 5 |u dkfz |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Jäger, Simon |b 6 |
| 773 | _ | _ | |a 10.1055/a-1353-4849 |g Vol. 9, no. 4, p. E562 - E571 |0 PERI:(DE-600)2761052-4 |n 4 |p E562 - E571 |t Endoscopy International Open |v 9 |y 2021 |x 2196-9736 |
| 909 | C | O | |o oai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:168404 |p VDB |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum |0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0 |k DKFZ |b 0 |6 P:(DE-He78)6cc3cc35505b446fde081e7cd89a4b87 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum |0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0 |k DKFZ |b 1 |6 P:(DE-He78)0321c153233e619c095d93d9d5546c9d |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum |0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0 |k DKFZ |b 3 |6 P:(DE-He78)6c5d058b7552d071a7fa4c5e943fff0f |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum |0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0 |k DKFZ |b 5 |6 P:(DE-He78)90d5535ff896e70eed81f4a4f6f22ae2 |
| 913 | 0 | _ | |a DE-HGF |b Gesundheit |l Krebsforschung |1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-310 |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-313 |3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3 |2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-300 |4 G:(DE-HGF)POF |v Cancer risk factors and prevention |x 0 |
| 913 | 1 | _ | |a DE-HGF |b Gesundheit |l Krebsforschung |1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-310 |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313 |3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4 |2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-300 |4 G:(DE-HGF)POF |v Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention |x 0 |
| 914 | 1 | _ | |y 2021 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300 |2 StatID |b Medline |d 2020-08-22 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0320 |2 StatID |b PubMed Central |d 2020-08-22 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501 |2 StatID |b DOAJ Seal |d 2020-08-22 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500 |2 StatID |b DOAJ |d 2020-08-22 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Peer Review |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030 |2 StatID |b DOAJ : Blind peer review |d 2020-08-22 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs CC BY-NC-ND (No Version) |0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNCNDNV |2 V:(DE-HGF) |b DOAJ |d 2020-08-22 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199 |2 StatID |b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List |d 2020-08-22 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a WoS |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0112 |2 StatID |b Emerging Sources Citation Index |d 2020-08-22 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150 |2 StatID |b Web of Science Core Collection |d 2020-08-22 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Article Processing Charges |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0561 |2 StatID |d 2020-08-22 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Article Processing Charges |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0561 |2 StatID |d 2020-08-22 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Fees |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0700 |2 StatID |d 2020-08-22 |
| 920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-He78)C070-20160331 |k C070 |l C070 Klinische Epidemiologie und Alternf. |x 0 |
| 920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-He78)TU01-20160331 |k TU01 |l DKTK TU zentral |x 1 |
| 920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-He78)C120-20160331 |k C120 |l Präventive Onkologie |x 2 |
| 920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-He78)HD01-20160331 |k HD01 |l DKTK HD zentral |x 3 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a journal |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a VDB |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-He78)C070-20160331 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-He78)TU01-20160331 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-He78)C120-20160331 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-He78)HD01-20160331 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a UNRESTRICTED |
| Library | Collection | CLSMajor | CLSMinor | Language | Author |
|---|