001     168506
005     20240229133610.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1016/j.euf.2021.04.007
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a pmid:33895087
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a altmetric:104685788
|2 altmetric
037 _ _ |a DKFZ-2021-00938
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Loeffler, Chiara Maria Lavinia
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Artificial Intelligence-based Detection of FGFR3 Mutational Status Directly from Routine Histology in Bladder Cancer: A Possible Preselection for Molecular Testing?
260 _ _ |a Amsterdam
|c 2022
|b Elsevier
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1654856365_19431
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
500 _ _ |a 2022 Mar;8(2):472-479
520 _ _ |a Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitor treatment has become the first clinically approved targeted therapy in bladder cancer. However, it requires previous molecular testing of each patient, which is costly and not ubiquitously available.To determine whether an artificial intelligence system is able to predict mutations of the FGFR3 gene directly from routine histology slides of bladder cancer.We trained a deep learning network to detect FGFR3 mutations on digitized slides of muscle-invasive bladder cancers stained with hematoxylin and eosin from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort (n = 327) and validated the algorithm on the 'Aachen' cohort (n = 182; n = 121 pT2-4, n = 34 stroma-invasive pT1, and n = 27 noninvasive pTa tumors).The primary endpoint was the area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) for mutation detection. Performance of the deep learning system was compared with visual scoring by an uropathologist.In the TCGA cohort, FGFR3 mutations were detected with an AUROC of 0.701 (p < 0.0001). In the Aachen cohort, FGFR3 mutants were found with an AUROC of 0.725 (p < 0.0001). When trained on TCGA, the network generalized to the Aachen cohort, and detected FGFR3 mutants with an AUROC of 0.625 (p = 0.0112). A subgroup analysis and histological evaluation found highest accuracy in papillary growth, luminal gene expression subtypes, females, and American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage II tumors. In a head-to-head comparison, the deep learning system outperformed the uropathologist in detecting FGFR3 mutants.Our computer-based artificial intelligence system was able to detect genetic alterations of the FGFR3 gene of bladder cancer patients directly from histological slides. In the future, this system could be used to preselect patients for further molecular testing. However, analyses of larger, multicenter, muscle-invasive bladder cancer cohorts are now needed in order to validate and extend our findings.In this report, a computer-based artificial intelligence (AI) system was applied to histological slides to predict genetic alterations of the FGFR3 gene in bladder cancer. We found that the AI system was able to find the alteration with high accuracy. In the future, this system could be used to preselect patients for further molecular testing.
536 _ _ |a 313 - Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention (POF4-313)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313
|c POF4-313
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed, , Journals: inrepo01.inet.dkfz-heidelberg.de
650 _ 7 |a Artificial intelligence
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a Bladder cancer
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a Deep learning
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a FGFR3 mutations
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a Molecular testing for fibroblast growth factor receptor therapy
|2 Other
700 1 _ |a Ortiz Bruechle, Nadina
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Jung, Max
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Seillier, Lancelot
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Rose, Michael
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Laleh, Narmin Ghaffari
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Knuechel, Ruth
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Brinker, Titus J
|0 P:(DE-He78)1e33961c8780aca9b76d776d1fdc1ebb
|b 7
|u dkfz
700 1 _ |a Trautwein, Christian
|b 8
700 1 _ |a Gaisa, Nadine T
|b 9
700 1 _ |a Kather, Jakob N
|b 10
773 _ _ |a 10.1016/j.euf.2021.04.007
|g p. S2405456921001139
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2861750-2
|n 2
|p 472-479
|t European urology focus
|v 8
|y 2022
|x 2405-4569
909 C O |p VDB
|o oai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:168506
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 7
|6 P:(DE-He78)1e33961c8780aca9b76d776d1fdc1ebb
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Gesundheit
|l Krebsforschung
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-310
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-300
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention
|x 0
913 0 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Gesundheit
|l Krebsforschung
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-310
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-313
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-300
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Cancer risk factors and prevention
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2021
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2020-09-09
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2020-09-09
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2022-11-11
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2022-11-11
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2022-11-11
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2022-11-11
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1110
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Clinical Medicine
|d 2022-11-11
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)C140-20160331
|k C140
|l NWG Digitale Biomarker in der Onkologie
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)C140-20160331
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21