% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Hilvo:169060,
author = {M. Hilvo and I. Dhar and M. Lääperi and V. Lysne and G.
Sulo and G. S. Tell and P. Jousilahti and O. K. Nygård and
H. Brenner$^*$ and B. Schöttker$^*$ and R. Laaksonen},
title = {{P}rimary cardiovascular risk prediction by
{LDL}-cholesterol in {C}aucasian middle-aged and older
adults: a joint analysis of three cohorts.},
journal = {European journal of preventive cardiology},
volume = {29},
number = {3},
issn = {2047-4881},
address = {London [u.a.]},
publisher = {Sage Publ.},
reportid = {DKFZ-2021-01218},
pages = {e128-e137},
year = {2022},
note = {2022 Mar 25;29(3):e128-e137},
abstract = {Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is an
established causal driver of atherosclerotic cardiovascular
disease (ASCVD), but its performance and age-dependency as a
biomarker for incident events and mortality arising from
ASCVD is less clear. The aim was to determine the value of
LDL-C as a susceptibility/risk biomarker for incident
coronary heart disease (CHD), ASCVD, and stroke events and
deaths, for the age groups <50 and ≥50 years.The
performance of LDL-C was evaluated in three cohorts, FINRISK
2002 (n = 7709), HUSK (n = 5431), and ESTHER (n = 4559), by
Cox proportional hazards models, C-statistics, and net
reclassification index calculations. Additionally, the
hazard ratios (HRs) for the three cohorts were pooled by
meta-analysis. The most consistent association was observed
for CHD $[95\%$ confidence interval (CI) for HRs per
standard deviation ranging from 0.99 to 1.37], whereas the
results were more modest for ASCVD (0.96-1.18) due to lack
of association with stroke (0.77-1.24). The association and
discriminatory value of LDL-C with all endpoints in FINRISK
2002 and HUSK were attenuated in subjects 50 years and older
[HRs $(95\%$ CI) obtained from meta-analysis 1.11
(1.04-1.18) for CHD, 1.15 (1.02-1.29) for CHD death, 1.02
(0.98-1.06) for ASCVD, 1.12 (1.02-1.23) for ASCVD death, and
0.97 (0.89-1.05) for stroke].In middle-aged and older
adults, associations between LDL-C and all the studied
cardiovascular endpoints were relatively weak, while LDL-C
showed stronger association with rare events of pre-mature
CHD or ASCVD death among middle-aged adults. The predictive
performance of LDL-C also depends on the studied
cardiovascular endpoint.},
keywords = {Cholesterol (Other) / Guideline (Other) / LDL (Other) /
Performance (Other) / Prediction (Other) / Risk (Other)},
cin = {C070},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)C070-20160331},
pnm = {313 - Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention (POF4-313)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:34060615},
doi = {10.1093/eurjpc/zwab075},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/169060},
}