Home > Publications database > Consistent Major Differences in Sex- and Age-Specific Diagnostic Performance among Nine Faecal Immunochemical Tests Used for Colorectal Cancer Screening. > print

001     169975
005     20240229133701.0
024 7 _ |a 10.3390/cancers13143574
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a pmid:34298786
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a altmetric:110342001
|2 altmetric
037 _ _ |a DKFZ-2021-01675
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Gies, Anton
|0 P:(DE-He78)6d4d6a0e2d726f899086ca98cd560922
|b 0
|e First author
245 _ _ |a Consistent Major Differences in Sex- and Age-Specific Diagnostic Performance among Nine Faecal Immunochemical Tests Used for Colorectal Cancer Screening.
260 _ _ |a Basel
|c 2021
|b MDPI
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1640799984_4191
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
500 _ _ |a #EA:C120#LA:C070#
520 _ _ |a Evidence on diagnostic performance of faecal immunochemical tests (FITs) by sex and age is scarce. We aimed to evaluate FIT performance for detection of advanced colorectal neoplasia (AN) by sex and age across nine different FIT brands in a colonoscopy-controlled setting. The faecal samples were obtained from 2042 participants of colonoscopy screening. All eligible cases with AN (n = 216) and 300 randomly selected participants without AN were included. Diagnostic performance for detection of AN was assessed by sex and age (50-64 vs. 65-79 years for each of the nine FITs individually and for all FITs combined. Sensitivity was consistently lower, and specificity was consistently higher for females as compared with males (pooled values at original FIT cutoffs, 25.7% vs. 34.6%, p = 0.12 and 96.2% vs. 90.8%, p < 0.01, respectively). Positive predictive values (PPVs) were similar between both sexes, but negative predictive values (NPVs) were consistently higher for females (pooled values, 91.8% vs. 86.6%, p < 0.01). Sex-specific cutoffs attenuated differences in sensitivities but increased differences in predictive values. According to age, sensitivities and specificities were similar, whereas PPVs were consistently lower and NPVs were consistently higher for the younger participants. A negative FIT is less reliable in ruling out AN among men than among women and among older than among younger participants. Comparisons of measures of diagnostic performance among studies with different sex or age distributions should be interpreted with caution.
536 _ _ |a 313 - Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention (POF4-313)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313
|c POF4-313
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed, , Journals: inrepo01.inet.dkfz-heidelberg.de
650 _ 7 |a colon cancer
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a early detection
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a faecal occult blood test
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a prevention
|2 Other
700 1 _ |a Niedermaier, Tobias
|0 P:(DE-He78)20dc4ad11ff465acf5b99f1e679e10b7
|b 1
|e First author
700 1 _ |a Alwers, Elizabeth
|0 P:(DE-He78)9b2a61b2abe4a64ca23b6783b7c4fe63
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Hielscher, Thomas
|0 P:(DE-He78)743a4a82daab55306a2c88b9f6bf8c2f
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Weigl, Korbinian
|0 P:(DE-He78)f4e98340e600f7411886c21c7b778d36
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Heisser, Thomas
|0 P:(DE-He78)c465139c8b95a919efed7d35ca83ca80
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Schrotz-King, Petra
|0 P:(DE-He78)01ef71f71b01a3ec3b698653fd43fe86
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Hoffmeister, Michael
|0 P:(DE-He78)6c5d058b7552d071a7fa4c5e943fff0f
|b 7
700 1 _ |a Brenner, Hermann
|0 P:(DE-He78)90d5535ff896e70eed81f4a4f6f22ae2
|b 8
|e Last author
773 _ _ |a 10.3390/cancers13143574
|g Vol. 13, no. 14, p. 3574 -
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2527080-1
|n 14
|p 3574 -
|t Cancers
|v 13
|y 2021
|x 2072-6694
909 C O |p VDB
|o oai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:169975
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-He78)6d4d6a0e2d726f899086ca98cd560922
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-He78)20dc4ad11ff465acf5b99f1e679e10b7
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-He78)9b2a61b2abe4a64ca23b6783b7c4fe63
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-He78)743a4a82daab55306a2c88b9f6bf8c2f
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 4
|6 P:(DE-He78)f4e98340e600f7411886c21c7b778d36
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 5
|6 P:(DE-He78)c465139c8b95a919efed7d35ca83ca80
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 6
|6 P:(DE-He78)01ef71f71b01a3ec3b698653fd43fe86
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 7
|6 P:(DE-He78)6c5d058b7552d071a7fa4c5e943fff0f
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 8
|6 P:(DE-He78)90d5535ff896e70eed81f4a4f6f22ae2
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Gesundheit
|l Krebsforschung
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-310
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-300
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2021
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b CANCERS : 2019
|d 2021-05-04
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2021-05-04
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2021-05-04
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0320
|2 StatID
|b PubMed Central
|d 2021-05-04
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ Seal
|d 2021-05-04
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
|d 2021-05-04
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ : Blind peer review
|d 2021-05-04
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY (No Version)
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNV
|2 V:(DE-HGF)
|b DOAJ
|d 2021-05-04
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
|d 2021-05-04
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
|d 2021-05-04
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2021-05-04
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2021-05-04
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
|d 2021-05-04
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1190
|2 StatID
|b Biological Abstracts
|d 2021-05-04
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2021-05-04
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2021-05-04
915 _ _ |a IF >= 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905
|2 StatID
|b CANCERS : 2019
|d 2021-05-04
915 _ _ |a Article Processing Charges
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0561
|2 StatID
|d 2021-05-04
915 _ _ |a Fees
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0700
|2 StatID
|d 2021-05-04
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)C120-20160331
|k C120
|l Präventive Onkologie
|x 0
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)C070-20160331
|k C070
|l C070 Klinische Epidemiologie und Alternf.
|x 1
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)C060-20160331
|k C060
|l C060 Biostatistik
|x 2
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)HD01-20160331
|k HD01
|l DKTK HD zentral
|x 3
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)C120-20160331
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)C070-20160331
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)C060-20160331
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)HD01-20160331
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED

LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21