Home > Publications database > Improvements in beam's eye view fiducial tracking using a novel multilayer imager. > print

001     170001
005     20240229133702.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1088/1361-6560/ac1246
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a pmid:34233309
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a 0031-9155
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1361-6560
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a altmetric:108935823
|2 altmetric
037 _ _ |a DKFZ-2021-01700
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 530
100 1 _ |a Harris, T. C.
|0 0000-0002-5594-5728
|b 0
|e First author
245 _ _ |a Improvements in beam's eye view fiducial tracking using a novel multilayer imager.
260 _ _ |a Bristol
|c 2021
|b IOP Publ.
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1627463981_3141
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
500 _ _ |a #EA:E041#
520 _ _ |a Purpose.Electronic portal image devices (EPIDs) have been investigated previously for beams-eye view (BEV) applications such as tumor tracking but are limited by low contrast-to-noise ratio and detective quantum efficiency. A novel multilayer imager (MLI), consisting of four stacked flat-panels was used to measure improvements in fiducial tracking during liver stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) procedures compared to a single layer EPID.Methods.The prototype MLI was installed on a clinical TrueBeam linac in place of the conventional DMI single-layer EPID. The panel was extended during volumetric modulated arc therapy SBRT treatments in order to passively acquire data during therapy. Images were acquired for six patients receiving SBRT to liver metastases over two fractions each, one with the MLI using all 4 layers and one with the MLI using the top layer only, representing a standard EPID. The acquired frames were processed by a previously published tracking algorithm modified to identify implanted radiopaque fiducials. Truth data was determined using respiratory traces combined with partial manual tracking. Results for 4- and 1-layer mode were compared against truth data for tracking accuracy and efficiency. Tracking and noise improvements as a function of gantry angle were determined.Results. Tracking efficiency with 4-layers improved to 82.8% versus 58.4% for the 1-layer mode, a relative improvement of 41.7%. Fiducial tracking with 1-layer returned a root mean square error (RMSE) of 2.1 mm compared to 4-layer RMSE of 1.5 mm, a statistically significant (p < 0.001) improvement of 0.6 mm. The reduction in noise correlated with an increase in successfully tracked frames (r = 0.913) and with increased tracking accuracy (0.927).Conclusion. Increases in MV photon detection efficiency by utilization of a MLI results in improved fiducial tracking for liver SBRT treatments. Future clinical applications utilizing BEV imaging may be enhanced by including similar noise reduction strategies.
536 _ _ |a 315 - Bildgebung und Radioonkologie (POF4-315)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-315
|c POF4-315
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed, , Journals: inrepo01.inet.dkfz-heidelberg.de
650 _ 7 |a EPID
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a beams eye view
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a tumor tracking
|2 Other
700 1 _ |a Seco, J.
|0 P:(DE-He78)102624aca75cfe987c05343d5fdcf2fe
|b 1
|u dkfz
700 1 _ |a Ferguson, D.
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Jacobson, M.
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Myronakis, M.
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Lozano, I Valencia
|0 0000-0002-9130-8590
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Lehmann, M.
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Huber, P.
|b 7
700 1 _ |a Fueglistaller, R.
|b 8
700 1 _ |a Morf, D.
|b 9
700 1 _ |a Mamon, H. J.
|b 10
700 1 _ |a Mancias, J. D.
|b 11
700 1 _ |a Martin, N. E.
|b 12
700 1 _ |a Berbeco, R. I.
|b 13
773 _ _ |a 10.1088/1361-6560/ac1246
|g Vol. 66, no. 15, p. 155007 -
|0 PERI:(DE-600)1473501-5
|n 15
|p 155007
|t Physics in medicine and biology
|v 66
|y 2021
|x 1361-6560
909 C O |o oai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:170001
|p VDB
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 0
|6 0000-0002-5594-5728
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-He78)102624aca75cfe987c05343d5fdcf2fe
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Gesundheit
|l Krebsforschung
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-310
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-315
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-300
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Bildgebung und Radioonkologie
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2021
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
|d 2021-01-28
|w ger
915 _ _ |a National-Konsortium
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0430
|2 StatID
|d 2021-01-28
|w ger
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2021-01-28
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2021-01-28
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2021-01-28
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1030
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Life Sciences
|d 2021-01-28
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2021-01-28
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
|d 2021-01-28
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1190
|2 StatID
|b Biological Abstracts
|d 2021-01-28
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2021-01-28
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2021-01-28
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b PHYS MED BIOL : 2019
|d 2021-01-28
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
|d 2021-01-28
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
|d 2021-01-28
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
|d 2021-01-28
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)E041-20160331
|k E041
|l E041 Medizinische Physik in der Radioonkologie
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)E041-20160331
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED

LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21