% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Londoo:170450,
author = {C. Londoño and V. Cayssials and I. de Villasante and M.
Crous-Bou and A. Scalbert and E. Weiderpass and A. Agudo and
A. Tjønneland and A. Olsen and K. Overvad and V. Katzke$^*$
and M. Schulze and D. Palli and V. Krogh and M. Santucci de
Magistris and R. Tumino and F. Ricceri and I. T. Gram and C.
Rylander and G. Skeie and M.-J. Sánchez and P. Amiano and
J. M. Huerta and A. Barricarte and H. Sartor and E.
Sonestedt and A. Esberg and A. Idahl and Y. Mahamat-Saleh
and N. Laouali and M. Kvaskoff and R. Turzanski-Fortner$^*$
and R. Zamora-Ros},
title = {{P}olyphenol {I}ntake and {E}pithelial {O}varian {C}ancer
{R}isk in the {E}uropean {P}rospective {I}nvestigation into
{C}ancer and {N}utrition ({EPIC}) {S}tudy.},
journal = {Antioxidants},
volume = {10},
number = {8},
issn = {2076-3921},
address = {Basel},
publisher = {MDPI},
reportid = {DKFZ-2021-01943},
pages = {1249},
year = {2021},
abstract = {Despite some epidemiological evidence on the protective
effects of polyphenol intake on epithelial ovarian cancer
(EOC) risk from case-control studies, the evidence is scarce
from prospective studies and non-existent for several
polyphenol classes. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the
associations between the intake of total, classes and
subclasses of polyphenols and EOC risk in a large
prospective study. The study was conducted in the European
Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)
cohort, which included 309,129 adult women recruited mostly
from the general population. Polyphenol intake was assessed
through validated country-specific dietary questionnaires
and the Phenol-Explorer database. During a mean follow-up of
14 years, 1469 first incident EOC cases (including 806
serous, 129 endometrioid, 102 mucinous, and 67 clear cell
tumours) were identified. In multivariable-adjusted Cox
regression models, the hazard ratio in the highest quartile
of total polyphenol intake compared with the lowest quartile
(HRQ4vsQ1) was 1.14 $(95\%$ CI 0.94-1.39; p-trend = 0.11).
Similarly, the intake of most classes and subclasses of
polyphenols were not related to either overall EOC risk or
any EOC subtype. A borderline statistically significant
positive association was observed between phenolic acid
intake (HRQ4vsQ1 = 1.20, $95\%$ CI 1.01-1.43; p-trend =
0.02) and EOC risk, especially for the serous subtype and in
women with obesity, although these associations did not
exceed the Bonferroni correction threshold. The current
results do not support any association between polyphenol
intake and EOC in our large European prospective study.
Results regarding phenolic acid intake need further
investigation.},
keywords = {EPIC (Other) / cohort (Other) / flavonoids (Other) / intake
(Other) / ovarian cancer (Other) / polyphenols (Other)},
cin = {C020},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)C020-20160331},
pnm = {313 - Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention (POF4-313)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:34439497},
pmc = {pmc:PMC8389235},
doi = {10.3390/antiox10081249},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/170450},
}