% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Chen:170520,
author = {L.-J. Chen$^*$ and T. N. M. Nguyen$^*$ and J.
Chang-Claude$^*$ and M. Hoffmeister$^*$ and H. Brenner$^*$
and B. Schöttker$^*$},
title = {{A}ssociation of polypharmacy with colorectal cancer
survival among older patients.},
journal = {The oncologist},
volume = {26},
number = {12},
issn = {1549-490X},
address = {Hoboken, NJ},
publisher = {Wiley},
reportid = {DKFZ-2021-01979},
pages = {e2170-e2180},
year = {2021},
note = {#EA:C070#LA:C070# /2021 Dec;26(12):e2170-e2180},
abstract = {In geriatric oncology, polypharmacy is often assessed
during a comprehensive geriatric assessment. Previous
studies about its association with survival among colorectal
cancer (CRC) patients were inconclusive and had high risk
for indication bias.A cohort study was conducted with 3,239
CRC patients, aged ≥65 years, who were recruited in
Germany between 2003 and 2016 while being hospitalized for
CRC surgery. We defined polypharmacy as concurrent use of 5
or more drugs, and excessive polypharmacy (EPP) as
concurrent use of 8 or more drugs. Cox proportional hazards
regression models were performed to assess the associations
of polypharmacy with 5-year overall (OS), CRC specific
(CSS), and non-cancer specific survival (NCS) with rigorous
adjustment for morbidity to minimize indication bias (e.g.,
for cancer stage, functional status, and 13 common
diseases/conditions).The prevalence of polypharmacy was
$54.7\%$ and that of EPP was $24.2\%.$ During up to 5 years
of follow-up, 1,070 participants died among whom 615 died of
CRC and 296 died of other causes than cancer. EPP was
statistically significantly associated with poorer up to
5-year OS (hazard ratio (HR) $[95\%$ CI]: 1.23 [1.02-1.47])
and CSS (1.31 [1.03-1.68]). HR point estimate for NCS was
higher than 1 (1.22) but not statistically
significant.Polypharmacy was very common and EPP was a weak
risk factor for mortality in this large cohort of older CRC
patients. Clinical trials are needed to address the
causality of this relationship because older CRC patients
might benefit from de-prescribing drugs without an
indication.The results of our study support the hypothesis
that excessive polypharmacy, defined as use of 8 or more
concurrently used active substances, has a negative impact
on older colorectal cancer (CRC) patients' prognosis. Our
study suggests to oncologists that performing a medication
review for older CRC patients with 8 drugs or more is
indicated (especially when a broader comprehensive geriatric
assessment is being performed). Such a medication review
should not only focus on reducing the number of medications
(by de-prescribing drugs without an indication) but should
also check the appropriateness of indicated drugs for older
(cancer) patients.},
keywords = {Colorectal cancer (Other) / Comprehensive Geriatric
Assessment (CGA) (Other) / Geriatric Oncology (Other) /
Polypharmacy (Other) / Survival (Other)},
cin = {C070 / C020 / C120 / HD01},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)C070-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)C020-20160331 /
I:(DE-He78)C120-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)HD01-20160331},
pnm = {313 - Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention (POF4-313)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:34476870},
doi = {10.1002/onco.13961},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/170520},
}