001     176937
005     20240229133725.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1186/s13550-021-00846-y
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a pmid:34628525
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a altmetric:114928976
|2 altmetric
037 _ _ |a DKFZ-2021-02177
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Sachpekidis, Christos
|0 P:(DE-He78)69d2d5247c019c2a2075502dc11bf0b2
|b 0
|e First author
|u dkfz
245 _ _ |a The prognostic significance of [18F]FDG PET/CT in multiple myeloma according to novel interpretation criteria (IMPeTUs).
260 _ _ |a Heidelberg
|c 2021
|b Springer
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1634038908_10607
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
500 _ _ |a #EA:E060#LA:E060#
520 _ _ |a [18F]FDG PET/CT is the elective imaging modality for treatment monitoring in multiple myeloma (MM). However, MM is a heterogeneous disease from an imaging point of view, raising challenges in interpretation of PET/CT. We herein investigated the prognostic role of the novel Italian Myeloma criteria for PET Use (IMPeTUs) in MM patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy (HDT) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT).Forty-seven patients with newly diagnosed MM underwent [18F]FDG PET/CT before commencement of treatment (baseline PET/CT). Thirty-four of them (72.3%) were also examined after completion of ASCT (follow-up PET/CT). PET/CT analysis was based on the IMPeTUs criteria, which take into consideration-among others-the metabolic state of the bone marrow based on the 5-point Deauville score (DS), the number and metabolic state of focal [18F]FDG-avid lesions, as well as the presence of paramedullary disease (PMD) and extramedullary disease (EMD). We analyzed whether parameters from IMPeTUs correlate with clinically relevant parameters and patients' outcome, as assessed by progression-free survival (PFS).Median follow-up from baseline and follow-up PET/CT were 85.1 months and 76.7 months, respectively. The number of focal, [18F]FDG-avid lesions significantly correlated with the bone marrow infiltration rate and the R-ISS stage, while the presence of PMD was associated with LDH. After univariate survival analysis, the number of focal, [18F]FDG-avid lesions both before and after therapy as well as the presence of PMD and EMD before therapy adversely affected PFS. Multivariate survival analysis for baseline parameters confirmed that the number of focal, [18F]FDG-avid lesions and the presence of EMD are associated with adverse prognosis, irrespective of the ISS stage and/or the presence of high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities. The 5-point DS of [18F]FDG uptake in reference bone marrow and focal lesions showed a significant decrease as response to treatment, but it did not affect PFS.Several parameters utilized in IMPeTUs predict PFS in MM patients, suggesting the potentially significant role of the new criteria in patient stratification and response assessment. Additional studies are warranted for the further evaluation of IMPeTUs in the direction of establishment of robust cut-off values with a prognostic significance in the disease.
536 _ _ |a 315 - Bildgebung und Radioonkologie (POF4-315)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-315
|c POF4-315
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed, , Journals: inrepo01.inet.dkfz-heidelberg.de
650 _ 7 |a Interpretation criteria
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a Italian Myeloma criteria for PET Use (IMPeTUs)
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a Multiple myeloma
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a [18F]FDG PET/CT
|2 Other
700 1 _ |a Merz, Maximilian
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Raab, Marc-Steffen
|0 P:(DE-He78)1cb537e833afd985097ccfaddffb2ef3
|b 2
|u dkfz
700 1 _ |a Bertsch, Uta
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Weru, Vivienn
|0 P:(DE-He78)7dc85735e114a4ace658ba1450a2cca6
|b 4
|u dkfz
700 1 _ |a Kopp-Schneider, Annette
|0 P:(DE-He78)bb6a7a70f976eb8df1769944bf913596
|b 5
|u dkfz
700 1 _ |a Jauch, Anna
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Goldschmidt, Hartmut
|b 7
700 1 _ |a Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss, Antonia
|0 P:(DE-He78)b2df3652dfa3e19d5e96dfc53f44a992
|b 8
|e Last author
|u dkfz
773 _ _ |a 10.1186/s13550-021-00846-y
|g Vol. 11, no. 1, p. 100
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2619892-7
|n 1
|p 100
|t EJNMMI Research
|v 11
|y 2021
|x 2191-219X
909 C O |o oai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:176937
|p VDB
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-He78)69d2d5247c019c2a2075502dc11bf0b2
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-He78)1cb537e833afd985097ccfaddffb2ef3
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 4
|6 P:(DE-He78)7dc85735e114a4ace658ba1450a2cca6
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 5
|6 P:(DE-He78)bb6a7a70f976eb8df1769944bf913596
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 8
|6 P:(DE-He78)b2df3652dfa3e19d5e96dfc53f44a992
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Gesundheit
|l Krebsforschung
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-310
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-315
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-300
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Bildgebung und Radioonkologie
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2021
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b EJNMMI RES : 2019
|d 2021-02-04
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2021-02-04
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2021-02-04
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0320
|2 StatID
|b PubMed Central
|d 2021-02-04
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ Seal
|d 2021-02-04
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
|d 2021-02-04
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ : Blind peer review
|d 2021-02-04
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY (No Version)
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNV
|2 V:(DE-HGF)
|b DOAJ
|d 2021-02-04
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
|d 2021-02-04
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
|d 2021-02-04
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2021-02-04
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2021-02-04
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1110
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Clinical Medicine
|d 2021-02-04
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2021-02-04
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2021-02-04
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
|d 2021-02-04
915 _ _ |a Article Processing Charges
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0561
|2 StatID
|d 2021-02-04
915 _ _ |a Fees
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0700
|2 StatID
|d 2021-02-04
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)E060-20160331
|k E060
|l E060 KKE Nuklearmedizin
|x 0
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)A360-20160331
|k A360
|l KKE Mol. Hämatologie/Onkologie
|x 1
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)C060-20160331
|k C060
|l C060 Biostatistik
|x 2
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)E060-20160331
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)A360-20160331
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)C060-20160331
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21