% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Reifegerste:177492,
      author       = {D. Reifegerste and M. Rosset and F. Czerwinski and E.
                      Baumann and A. Gaisser$^*$ and E. Kludt$^*$ and S.
                      Weg-Remers$^*$},
      title        = {{U}nderstanding the {P}athway of {C}ancer {I}nformation
                      {S}eeking: {C}ancer {I}nformation {S}ervices as a
                      {S}upplement to {I}nformation from {O}ther {S}ources.},
      journal      = {Journal of cancer education},
      volume       = {38},
      number       = {1},
      issn         = {1543-0154},
      address      = {New York, NY},
      publisher    = {Springer},
      reportid     = {DKFZ-2021-02579},
      pages        = {175-184},
      year         = {2023},
      note         = {#LA:M100# / 2023 Feb;38(1):175-184},
      abstract     = {Cancer information services (CISs) can play an important
                      role within the pathway of cancer information seeking, but
                      so far, this role is not well understood. Callers (n =
                      6,255) who contacted the largest provider of cancer
                      information in Germany participated in a survey in which
                      they reported their information sources, information level,
                      and needs leading to the call. Persons with prior
                      information from a physician (n = 1,507) were compared to
                      people with prior online information (n = 901) and people
                      with prior information from both sources (n = 2,776). Nearly
                      all callers $(96.7\%)$ stated prior sources, while
                      physicians and the Internet were the most frequently
                      reported sources. People, who only talked to a doctor
                      before, are more likely to be a patient and in the disease
                      stages during/after the first treatment or with recurrence
                      than prior Internet users. The two groups do not differ in
                      their prior information level but did differ in their
                      information needs. CISs are an important supplement to other
                      sources, while the information repertoire depends on
                      patients' stages during the cancer journey. Specific
                      characteristics and needs of callers with different prior
                      information sources help to individualize the service of
                      CISs and similar providers.},
      keywords     = {Cancer (Other) / Cancer information seeking (Other) /
                      Cancer information service (Other) / Information sources
                      (Other) / Pathway (Other)},
      cin          = {M100},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {I:(DE-He78)M100-20160331},
      pnm          = {313 - Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention (POF4-313)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {pmid:34783995},
      doi          = {10.1007/s13187-021-02095-y},
      url          = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/177492},
}