Home > Publications database > Ethanol extracts of mango seeds added to the diet of pigs increases antioxidant capacity of processed pork. > print

001     178200
005     20240229133802.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1590/0001-3765202120210406
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a pmid:34878049
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a 0001-3765
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1678-2690
|2 ISSN
037 _ _ |a DKFZ-2021-03198
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 000
100 1 _ |a Araújo, Lina R S
|0 0000-0003-3325-4130
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Ethanol extracts of mango seeds added to the diet of pigs increases antioxidant capacity of processed pork.
260 _ _ |a Rio de Janeiro
|c 2021
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1639992672_24163
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Synthetic antioxidants (e.g.butylhydroxytoluene, BHT) are routinely used for to restrict oxidative processes of meat products, but they are implicated as harmful to the health of humans. Therefore natural alternatives, such as plant antioxidants, have been sought as replacements. Plant antioxidants when added to the diet can be incorporated into meat and reduce the need for the addition of synthetic antioxidants during processing. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of ethanol extracts of mango seeds (EEMS) in the diet of pigs on qualitative parameters and total antioxidant capacity of mortadella produced from these animals. Thirty-two pigs with an average 60 days of age were distributed among four treatments: control=no antioxidant; BHT=200ppm BHT; EEMS200=200ppm of EEMS and EEMS400=400ppm of EEMS. At 145 days of age the animals were slaughtered and loin was removed for the preparation of mortadella, which was analyzed during 90 days of storage at 4°C. A higher content of polyphenolic compounds and, total antioxidant capacity in mortadellas processed with meat of animals which consumed the EEMS400 ration after 60 and 90 days of storage was observed. EEMS polyphenolic antioxidants incorporated into pork through the diet results in an increase of total antioxidant capacity in the processed product.
536 _ _ |a 313 - Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention (POF4-313)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313
|c POF4-313
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed, , Journals: inrepo01.inet.dkfz-heidelberg.de
650 _ 7 |a Antioxidants
|2 NLM Chemicals
650 _ 7 |a Plant Extracts
|2 NLM Chemicals
650 _ 7 |a Ethanol
|0 3K9958V90M
|2 NLM Chemicals
650 _ 2 |a Animals
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Antioxidants
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Diet
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Ethanol
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Mangifera
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Oxidation-Reduction
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Plant Extracts: pharmacology
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Pork Meat
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Red Meat
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Seeds
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Swine
|2 MeSH
700 1 _ |a Watanabe, Pedro H
|0 0000-0002-1010-2305
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Fernandes, Danilo R
|0 0000-0001-9801-8273
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Mello, Marcelle C A
|0 0000-0001-7345-5995
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Maia, Irvila R DE O
|0 0000-0002-1960-2314
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Silva, Ênio C DA
|0 0000-0002-6716-0792
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Owen, Robert
|0 P:(DE-He78)43996fb100428b0d99e233c3261f7187
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Nascimento, Germano A J DO
|0 0000-0003-3360-5922
|b 7
700 1 _ |a Trevisan, Maria T S
|0 0000-0003-1274-7497
|b 8
700 1 _ |a Freitas, Ednardo R
|0 0000-0001-7226-9517
|b 9
773 _ _ |a 10.1590/0001-3765202120210406
|g Vol. 93, no. suppl 4, p. e20210406
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2046885-4
|n suppl 4
|p e20210406
|t Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências
|v 93
|y 2021
|x 0001-3765
909 C O |o oai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:178200
|p VDB
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 6
|6 P:(DE-He78)43996fb100428b0d99e233c3261f7187
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Gesundheit
|l Krebsforschung
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-310
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-300
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2021
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ Seal
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ : Peer review
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY (No Version)
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNV
|2 V:(DE-HGF)
|b DOAJ
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1150
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1040
|2 StatID
|b Zoological Record
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1190
|2 StatID
|b Biological Abstracts
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b AN ACAD BRAS CIENC : 2019
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
|d 2021-01-27
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)C120-20160331
|k C120
|l Präventive Onkologie
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)C120-20160331
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED

LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21