% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Niedermaier:178590,
author = {T. Niedermaier$^*$ and Y. Balavarca$^*$ and A. Gies$^*$ and
K. Weigl$^*$ and F. Guo$^*$ and E. Alwers$^*$ and M.
Hoffmeister$^*$ and H. Brenner$^*$},
title = {{V}ariation of positive predictive values of fecal
immunochemical tests by polygenic risk score in a large
screening cohort.},
journal = {Clinical and translational gastroenterology},
volume = {13},
number = {3},
issn = {2155-384X},
address = {London},
publisher = {Nature Publ. Group},
reportid = {DKFZ-2022-00139},
pages = {e00458},
year = {2022},
note = {#EA:C070#LA:C070#LA:C120# / 2022 Jan 19;13(3):e00458},
abstract = {Prevalence of colorectal neoplasms varies by polygenic risk
scores (PRS). We aimed to assess to what extent PRS might be
relevant for defining personalized cutoff values for fecal
immunochemical tests (FITs) in colorectal cancer (CRC)
screening.Among 5,306 participants of screening colonoscopy
who provided a stool sample for a quantitative FIT
(Ridascreen Hemoglobin or FOB Gold) prior to colonoscopy a
PRS was determined, based on the number of risk alleles in
140 , single nucleotide polymorphism. Subjects were
classified into low, medium and high genetic risk for
colorectal neoplasms according to PRS tertiles. We
calculated positive predictive values (PPVs) and numbers
needed to scope (NNS) to detect one advanced neoplasm (AN)
by risk group, and cutoff variation needed to achieve
comparable PPVs across risk groups in the samples tested
with Ridascreen (N=1,271) and FOB Gold (N=4,035)
independently, using cutoffs yielding $85\%,$ $90\%$ or
$95\%$ specificity.Performance of both FITs was very similar
within each PRS group. For a given cutoff, PPVs were
consistently higher by $11\%-15\%$ units in the high-risk
PRS group compared to the low-risk group (all P-values
<0.05). Correspondingly, numbers needed to scope (NNS) to
detect one advanced neoplasm varied from 2 (high PRS, high
cutoff) to 5 (low PRS, low cutoff). Conversely, very
different FIT cutoffs would be needed to ensure comparable
PPVs across PRS groups.PPVs and NNS of FITs varied widely
across people with high and low genetic risk score. Further
research should evaluate the relevance of these differences
for personalized CRC screening.This study was partly funded
by grants from the German Research Council (DFG, grant No.
BR1704/16-1), the Federal Ministry of Education and Research
(BMBF, grant no. 01GL1712), and the German Cancer Aid (No.
70113330).},
cin = {C070 / C120 / HD01},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)C070-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)C120-20160331 /
I:(DE-He78)HD01-20160331},
pnm = {313 - Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention (POF4-313)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:35060941},
doi = {10.14309/ctg.0000000000000458},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/178590},
}