| 001 | 179063 | ||
| 005 | 20240229145531.0 | ||
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 10.3389/fneur.2022.758126 |2 doi |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a pmid:35250805 |2 pmid |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a pmc:PMC8894319 |2 pmc |
| 037 | _ | _ | |a DKFZ-2022-00441 |
| 041 | _ | _ | |a English |
| 082 | _ | _ | |a 610 |
| 100 | 1 | _ | |a Sato, Taku |b 0 |
| 245 | _ | _ | |a Correlation Between Thrombus Signal Intensity and Aneurysm Wall Thickness in Partially Thrombosed Intracranial Aneurysms Using 7T Magnetization-Prepared Rapid Acquisition Gradient Echo Magnetic Resonance Imaging. |
| 260 | _ | _ | |a Lausanne |c 2022 |b Frontiers Research Foundation |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a article |2 DRIVER |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Output Types/Journal article |2 DataCite |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |b journal |m journal |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16 |s 1646821983_1986 |2 PUB:(DE-HGF) |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a ARTICLE |2 BibTeX |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE |2 ORCID |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |0 0 |2 EndNote |
| 520 | _ | _ | |a The objective of this study is to investigate the relationship between the thrombus signal intensity and aneurysm wall thickness in partially thrombosed intracranial aneurysms in vivo with magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition gradient echo (MPRAGE) taken using 7T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and correlate the findings to wall instability.Sixteen partially thrombosed intracranial aneurysms were evaluated using a 7T whole-body MR system with nonenhanced MPRAGE. To normalize the thrombus signal intensity, its highest signal intensity was compared to that of the anterior corpus callosum of the same subject, and the signal intensity ratio was calculated. The correlation between the thrombus signal intensity ratio and the thickness of the aneurysm wall was analyzed. Furthermore, aneurysmal histopathological specimens from six tissue samples were compared with radiological findings to detect any correlation.The mean thrombus signal intensity ratio was 0.57 (standard error of the mean [SEM] 0.06, range 0.25-1.01). The mean thickness of the aneurysm wall was 1.25 (SEM 0.08, range 0.84-1.55) mm. The thrombus signal intensity ratio significantly correlated with the aneurysm wall thickness (p < 0.01). The aneurysm walls with the high thrombus signal intensity ratio were significantly thicker. In histopathological examinations, three patients with a hypointense thrombus had fewer macrophages infiltrating the thrombus and a thin degenerated aneurysmal wall. In contrast, three patients with a hyperintense thrombus had abundant macrophages infiltrating the thrombus.The thrombus signal intensity ratio in partially thrombosed intracranial aneurysms correlated with aneurysm wall thickness and histologic features, indicating wall instability. |
| 536 | _ | _ | |a 315 - Bildgebung und Radioonkologie (POF4-315) |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-315 |c POF4-315 |f POF IV |x 0 |
| 588 | _ | _ | |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed, , Journals: inrepo02.dkfz.de |
| 650 | _ | 7 | |a 7T magnetic resonance imaging |2 Other |
| 650 | _ | 7 | |a aneurysm wall |2 Other |
| 650 | _ | 7 | |a magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition gradient echo |2 Other |
| 650 | _ | 7 | |a partially thrombosed intracranial aneurysm |2 Other |
| 650 | _ | 7 | |a thrombus |2 Other |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Matsushige, Toshinori |b 1 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Chen, Bixia |b 2 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Gembruch, Oliver |b 3 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Dammann, Philipp |b 4 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Jabbarli, Ramazan |b 5 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Forsting, Michael |b 6 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Junker, Andreas |b 7 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Maderwald, Stefan |b 8 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Quick, Harald H |b 9 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Ladd, Mark E |0 P:(DE-He78)022611a2317e4de40fd912e0a72293a8 |b 10 |u dkfz |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Sure, Ulrich |b 11 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Wrede, Karsten H |b 12 |
| 773 | _ | _ | |a 10.3389/fneur.2022.758126 |g Vol. 13, p. 758126 |0 PERI:(DE-600)2564214-5 |p 758126 |t Frontiers in neurology |v 13 |y 2022 |x 1664-2295 |
| 909 | C | O | |o oai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:179063 |p VDB |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum |0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0 |k DKFZ |b 10 |6 P:(DE-He78)022611a2317e4de40fd912e0a72293a8 |
| 913 | 1 | _ | |a DE-HGF |b Gesundheit |l Krebsforschung |1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-310 |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-315 |3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4 |2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-300 |4 G:(DE-HGF)POF |v Bildgebung und Radioonkologie |x 0 |
| 914 | 1 | _ | |y 2022 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY (No Version) |0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNV |2 V:(DE-HGF) |b DOAJ |d 2021-01-28 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160 |2 StatID |b Essential Science Indicators |d 2021-01-28 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a WoS |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113 |2 StatID |b Science Citation Index Expanded |d 2021-01-28 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Article Processing Charges |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0561 |2 StatID |d 2021-01-28 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Fees |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0700 |2 StatID |d 2021-01-28 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a JCR |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100 |2 StatID |b FRONT NEUROL : 2021 |d 2022-11-18 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200 |2 StatID |b SCOPUS |d 2022-11-18 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300 |2 StatID |b Medline |d 2022-11-18 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501 |2 StatID |b DOAJ Seal |d 2021-05-11T13:11:28Z |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500 |2 StatID |b DOAJ |d 2021-05-11T13:11:28Z |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Peer Review |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030 |2 StatID |b DOAJ : Blind peer review |d 2021-05-11T13:11:28Z |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199 |2 StatID |b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List |d 2022-11-18 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150 |2 StatID |b Web of Science Core Collection |d 2022-11-18 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a IF < 5 |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900 |2 StatID |d 2022-11-18 |
| 920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-He78)E020-20160331 |k E020 |l E020 Med. Physik in der Radiologie |x 0 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a journal |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a VDB |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-He78)E020-20160331 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a UNRESTRICTED |
| Library | Collection | CLSMajor | CLSMinor | Language | Author |
|---|
guest ::