% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Alcala:179337,
author = {K. Alcala and D. Mariosa and K. Smith-Byrne and D.
Nasrollahzadeh Nesheli and R. Carreras-Torres and E. Ardanaz
Aicua and N. P. Bondonno and C. Bonet and M. Brunström and
B. Bueno-de-Mesquita and M.-D. Chirlaque and S. Christakoudi
and A. K. Heath and R. Kaaks$^*$ and V. Katzke$^*$ and V.
Krogh and B. Ljungberg and R. M. Martin and A. May and O.
Melander and D. Palli and M. Rodriguez-Barranco and C.
Sacerdote and T. Stocks and A. Tjønneland and R. C. Travis
and R. Vermeulen and S. Chanock and M. Purdue and E.
Weiderpass and D. Muller and P. Brennan and M. Johansson},
title = {{T}he relationship between blood pressure and risk of renal
cell carcinoma.},
journal = {International journal of epidemiology},
volume = {51},
number = {4},
issn = {0300-5771},
address = {Oxford},
publisher = {Oxford Univ. Press},
reportid = {DKFZ-2022-00603},
pages = {1317-1327},
year = {2022},
note = {2022 Aug 10;51(4):1317-1327},
abstract = {The relation between blood pressure and kidney cancer risk
is well established but complex and different study designs
have reported discrepant findings on the relative importance
of diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and systolic blood
pressure (SBP). In this study, we sought to describe the
temporal relation between diastolic and SBP with renal cell
carcinoma (RCC) risk in detail.Our study involved two
prospective cohorts: the European Prospective Investigation
into Cancer and Nutrition study and UK Biobank, including
>700 000 participants and 1692 incident RCC cases. Risk
analyses were conducted using flexible parametric survival
models for DBP and SBP both separately as well as with
mutuality adjustment and then adjustment for extended risk
factors. We also carried out univariable and multivariable
Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses (DBP: ninstruments =
251, SBP: ninstruments = 213) to complement the analyses of
measured DBP and SBP.In the univariable analysis, we
observed clear positive associations with RCC risk for both
diastolic and SBP when measured ≥5 years before diagnosis
and suggestive evidence for a stronger risk association in
the year leading up to diagnosis. In mutually adjusted
analysis, the long-term risk association of DBP remained,
with a hazard ratio (HR) per standard deviation increment 10
years before diagnosis (HR10y) of 1.20 $(95\%$ CI:
1.10-1.30), whereas the association of SBP was attenuated
(HR10y: 1.00, $95\%$ CI: 0.91-1.10). In the complementary
multivariable MR analysis, we observed an odds ratio for a
1-SD increment (ORsd) of 1.34 $(95\%$ CI: 1.08-1.67) for
genetically predicted DBP and 0.70 $(95\%$ CI: 0.56-0.88)
for genetically predicted SBP.The results of this
observational and MR study are consistent with an important
role of DBP in RCC aetiology. The relation between SBP and
RCC risk was less clear but does not appear to be
independent of DBP.},
keywords = {Mendelian randomization (Other) / RCC (Other) / diastolic
blood pressure (Other) / kidney cancer (Other) / systolic
blood pressure (Other)},
cin = {C020},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)C020-20160331},
pnm = {313 - Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention (POF4-313)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:35312764},
doi = {10.1093/ije/dyac042},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/179337},
}