% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Klotz:179959,
author = {R. Klotz and M. Holze and C. Dörr-Harim and E. Grohmann
and B. Nied and B. Lebert and S. Weg-Remers$^*$ and C. Lutz
and K. Meißler and P. Schloss and C. Ullrich and S.
Frankenhauser and H. Lutter and D. Bühler and A. Ahmed and
T. Gronlund and A. L. Mihaljevic and A. Mihaljevic and R.
Klotz and C. Dörr-Harim and D. Bühler and C. Dörr-Harim
and S. Frankenhauser and S. Gapp-Frasch and E. Grohmann and
V. Helmstädter and C. Hey and W. Hey and R. Klotz and A.
Mihaljevic and B. Lebert and C. Lutz and H. Lutter and C.
Lutz and K. Meißler and B. Nied and P. Schloss and S.
Stegmüller and P. Stünzi and A. Trabold-Hauk and C.
Ullrich and S. Weg-Remers$^*$ and M. Wensing},
collaboration = {F. Darmkrebs and S. G. F. D. S. C. Cancer},
title = {{T}op 10 research priorities in colorectal cancer: results
from the {C}olorectal {C}ancer {P}riority-{S}etting
{P}artnership.},
journal = {Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology},
volume = {149},
number = {4},
issn = {0171-5216},
address = {Berlin},
publisher = {Springer},
reportid = {DKFZ-2022-01008},
pages = {1561-1568},
year = {2023},
note = {2023 Apr;149(4):1561-1568},
abstract = {Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most frequent cause of
cancer death in the word. Which aspects of research into CRC
should be accorded the highest priority remains unclear,
because relevant stakeholders, such as patients, nurses, and
physicians, played hardly any part in the development of
research projects. The goal in forming the CRC
Priority-Setting Partnership (PSP) was to bring all relevant
stakeholders together to identify and prioritize unresolved
research questions regarding the diagnosis, treatment, and
follow-up of CRC.The CRC PSP worked in cooperation with the
British James Lind Alliance. An initial nationwide survey
was conducted, and evidence uncertainties were collected,
categorized, summarized, and compared with available
evidence from the literature. The as-yet unresolved
questions were (provisionally) ranked in a second national
wide survey, and at a concluding consensus workshop all
stakeholders came together to finalize the rankings in a
nominal group process and compile a top 10 list.In the first
survey $(34\%$ patients, $51\%$ healthcare professionals,
$15\%$ unknown), 1102 submissions were made. After exclusion
of duplicates and previously resolved questions, 66 topics
were then ranked in the second survey $(56\%$ patients,
$39\%$ healthcare professionals, $5\%$ unknown). This
interim ranking process revealed distinct differences
between relatives and healthcare professionals. The final
top 10 list compiled at the consensus workshop covers a wide
area of research topics.All relevant stakeholders in the CRC
PSP worked together to identify and prioritize the top 10
evidence uncertainties. The results give researchers and
funding bodies the opportunity to address the most
patient-relevant research projects. It is the first detailed
description of a PSP in Germany, and the first PSP on CRC
care worldwide.},
keywords = {Colorectal neoplasms (Other) / Forschungspartnerschaft
(Other) / Patient participation (Other) / Priority-Setting
Partnership (Other)},
cin = {M100},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)M100-20160331},
pnm = {313 - Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention (POF4-313)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:35579718},
doi = {10.1007/s00432-022-04042-w},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/179959},
}