% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Mittmann:180026,
author = {B. J. Mittmann and A. Seitel$^*$ and G. Echner$^*$ and W.
Johnen$^*$ and R. Gnirs$^*$ and L. Maier-Hein$^*$ and A.
Franz$^*$},
title = {{R}eattachable fiducial skin marker for automatic
multimodality registration.},
journal = {International journal of computer assisted radiology and
surgery},
volume = {17},
number = {11},
issn = {1861-6410},
address = {Heidelberg [u.a.]},
publisher = {Springer},
reportid = {DKFZ-2022-01043},
pages = {2141-2150},
year = {2022},
note = {#LA:E130# / 2022 Nov;17(11):2141-2150},
abstract = {Fusing image information has become increasingly important
for optimal diagnosis and treatment of the patient. Despite
intensive research towards markerless registration
approaches, fiducial marker-based methods remain the default
choice for a wide range of applications in clinical
practice. However, as especially non-invasive markers cannot
be positioned reproducibly in the same pose on the patient,
pre-interventional imaging has to be performed immediately
before the intervention for fiducial marker-based
registrations.We propose a new non-invasive, reattachable
fiducial skin marker concept for multi-modal registration
approaches including the use of electromagnetic or optical
tracking technologies. We furthermore describe a robust,
automatic fiducial marker localization algorithm for
computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging
(MRI) images. Localization of the new fiducial marker has
been assessed for different marker configurations using both
CT and MRI. Furthermore, we applied the marker in an
abdominal phantom study. For this, we attached the marker at
three poses to the phantom, registered ten segmented targets
of the phantom's CT image to live ultrasound images and
determined the target registration error (TRE) for each
target and each marker pose.Reattachment of the marker was
possible with a mean precision of 0.02 mm ± 0.01 mm. Our
algorithm successfully localized the marker automatically in
all ([Formula: see text]) evaluated CT/MRI images. Depending
on the marker pose, the mean ([Formula: see text]) TRE of
the abdominal phantom study ranged from 1.51 ± 0.75 mm to
4.65 ± 1.22 mm.The non-invasive, reattachable skin marker
concept allows reproducible positioning of the marker and
automatic localization in different imaging modalities. The
low TREs indicate the potential applicability of the marker
concept for clinical interventions, such as the puncture of
abdominal lesions, where current image-based registration
approaches still lack robustness and existing marker-based
methods are often impractical.},
keywords = {Automatic multimodality registration (Other) / Fiducial
marker assessment (Other) / Reattachable fiducial skin
marker (Other)},
cin = {E130 / E040 / E010},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)E130-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)E040-20160331 /
I:(DE-He78)E010-20160331},
pnm = {315 - Bildgebung und Radioonkologie (POF4-315)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-315},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:35604488},
doi = {10.1007/s11548-022-02639-7},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/180026},
}