Home > Publications database > Beam pulse structure and dose rate as determinants for the flash effect observed in zebrafish embryo. > print

001     180234
005     20240229145611.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.05.025
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a pmid:35661675
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a 0167-8140
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1879-0887
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a altmetric:129097829
|2 altmetric
037 _ _ |a DKFZ-2022-01185
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Karsch, Leonhard
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Beam pulse structure and dose rate as determinants for the flash effect observed in zebrafish embryo.
260 _ _ |a Amsterdam [u.a.]
|c 2022
|b Elsevier Science
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1656937801_30918
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
500 _ _ |a Volume 173, August 2022, Pages 49-54
520 _ _ |a Continuing recent experiments at the research electron accelerator ELBE at the Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf the influence of beam pulse structure on the Flash effect was investigated.The proton beam pulse structure of an isochronous cyclotron (UHDRiso) and a synchrocyclotron (UHDRsynchro) was mimicked at ELBE by quasi-continuous electron bunches at 13 MHz delivering mean dose rates of 287 Gy/s and 177 Gy/s and bunch dose rates of 106Gy/s and 109 Gy/s, respectively. For UHDRsynchro, 40 ms macro pulses at a frequency of 25 Hz superimposed the bunch delivery. For comparison, a maximum beam intensity (2.5 x 105 Gy/s mean and ∼109 Gy/s bunch dose rate) and a reference irradiation (of ∼8 Gy/min mean dose rate) were applied. Radiation induced changes were assessed in zebrafish embryos over four days post irradiation.Relative to the reference a significant protecting Flash effect was observed for all electron beam pulse regimes with less severe damage the higher the mean dose rate of the electron beam. Accordingly, the macro pulsing induced prolongation of treatment time at UHDRsynchro regime reduces the protecting effect compared to the maximum regime delivered at same bunch but higher mean dose rate. The Flash effect of the UHDRiso regime was confirmed at a clinical isochronous cyclotron comparing the damage induced by proton beams delivered at 300 Gy/s and ∼9 Gy/min.The recent findings indicate that the mean dose rate or treatment time are decisive for the normal tissue protecting Flash effect in zebrafish embryo.
536 _ _ |a 315 - Bildgebung und Radioonkologie (POF4-315)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-315
|c POF4-315
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed, , Journals: inrepo02.dkfz.de
650 _ 7 |a Electron Flash effect
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a Mean dose rate influence
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a Normal tissue toxicity
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a Proton Flash effect
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a Pulse structure
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a Ultra-high dose rate
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a Zebrafish embryo
|2 Other
700 1 _ |a Pawelke, Jörg
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Brand, Michael
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Hans, Stefan
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Hideghéty, Katalin
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Jansen, Jeannette
|0 P:(DE-He78)02e29e2d540ff21d777f3a03ec9f5ade
|b 5
|u dkfz
700 1 _ |a Lessmann, Elisabeth
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Löck, Steffen
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 7
700 1 _ |a Schürer, Michael
|b 8
700 1 _ |a Schurig, Rico
|b 9
700 1 _ |a Seco, Joao
|0 P:(DE-He78)102624aca75cfe987c05343d5fdcf2fe
|b 10
|u dkfz
700 1 _ |a Szabó, Emília Rita
|b 11
700 1 _ |a Beyreuther, Elke
|b 12
773 _ _ |a 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.05.025
|g p. S0167814022041317
|0 PERI:(DE-600)1500707-8
|p 49-54
|t Radiotherapy and oncology
|v 173
|y 2022
|x 0167-8140
909 C O |p VDB
|o oai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:180234
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 5
|6 P:(DE-He78)02e29e2d540ff21d777f3a03ec9f5ade
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 7
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 10
|6 P:(DE-He78)102624aca75cfe987c05343d5fdcf2fe
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Gesundheit
|l Krebsforschung
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-310
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-315
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-300
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Bildgebung und Radioonkologie
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2022
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2021-01-31
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1190
|2 StatID
|b Biological Abstracts
|d 2021-01-31
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2021-01-31
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
|d 2022-11-29
|w ger
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2022-11-29
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2022-11-29
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2022-11-29
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
|d 2022-11-29
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1110
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Clinical Medicine
|d 2022-11-29
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b RADIOTHER ONCOL : 2021
|d 2022-11-29
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2022-11-29
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
|d 2022-11-29
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
|d 2022-11-29
915 _ _ |a IF >= 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905
|2 StatID
|b RADIOTHER ONCOL : 2021
|d 2022-11-29
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)E041-20160331
|k E041
|l E041 Medizinische Physik in der Radioonkologie
|x 0
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)DD01-20160331
|k DD01
|l DKTK DD zentral
|x 1
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)E041-20160331
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)DD01-20160331
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED

LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21