000180978 001__ 180978
000180978 005__ 20220801162542.0
000180978 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1515/pac-2019-0809
000180978 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0033-4545
000180978 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1365-3075
000180978 037__ $$aDKFZ-2022-01703
000180978 082__ $$a540
000180978 1001_ $$aZherebker, Alexander$$b0
000180978 245__ $$aInterlaboratory comparison of humic substances compositional space as measured by Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (IUPAC Technical Report)
000180978 260__ $$aBerlin$$bde Gruyter$$c2020
000180978 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000180978 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000180978 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1659363821_22943
000180978 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000180978 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000180978 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000180978 520__ $$aInterlaboratory comparison on the determination of the molecular composition of humic substances (HS) was undertaken in the framework of IUPAC project 2016-015-2-600. The analysis was conducted using high resolution mass spectrometry, nominally, Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (FTICR MS) with electrospray ionization. Six samples of HS from freshwater, soil, and leonardite were used for this study, including one sample of humic acids (HA) from coal (leonardite), two samples of soil HA (the sod-podzolic soil and chernozem), two samples of soil fulvic acids (FA) (the sod-podzolic soil and chernozem), and one sample of freshwater humic acids (the Suwannee River). The samples were analyzed on five different FTICR MS instruments using the routine conditions applied in each participating laboratory. The results were collected as mass lists, which were further assigned formulae for the determination of molecular composition. The similarity of the obtained data was evaluated using appropriate statistical metrics. The results have shown that direct comparison of discrete stoichiometries assigned to the mass lists obtained by the different laboratories yielded poor results with low values of the Jaccard similarity score – not exceeding 0.56 (not more than 56 % of the similar peaks). The least similarity was observed for the aromatics-rich HA samples from leonardite (coal) and the chernozem soil, which might be connected to difficulties in their ionization. The reliable similarity among the data obtained in this intercomparison study was achieved only by transforming a singular point (stoichiometry) in van Krevelen diagram into a sizeable pixel (a number of closely located stoichiometries), which can be calculated from the population density distribution. The conclusion was made that, so far, these are descriptors of occupation density distribution, which provide the metrics compliant with the data quality requirements, such as the reproducibility of the data measurements on different instruments.
000180978 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: inrepo02.dkfz.de
000180978 7001_ $$aKim, Sunghwan$$b1
000180978 7001_ $$aSchmitt-Kopplin, Philippe$$b2
000180978 7001_ $$aSpencer, Robert G. M.$$b3
000180978 7001_ $$00000-0001-5313-6014$$aLechtenfeld, Oliver$$b4
000180978 7001_ $$aPodgorski, David C.$$b5
000180978 7001_ $$aHertkorn, Norbert$$b6
000180978 7001_ $$aHarir, Mourad$$b7
000180978 7001_ $$aNurfajin, Nissa$$b8
000180978 7001_ $$aKoch, Boris$$b9
000180978 7001_ $$aNikolaev, Eugene N.$$b10
000180978 7001_ $$aShirshin, Evgeny A.$$b11
000180978 7001_ $$aBerezin, Sergey A.$$b12
000180978 7001_ $$aKats, Dmitry S.$$b13
000180978 7001_ $$0P:(DE-He78)5f0460f01de6e6633ab2f2253a8998dc$$aRukhovich, Gleb$$b14$$udkfz
000180978 7001_ $$aPerminova, Irina V.$$b15
000180978 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2022101-0$$a10.1515/pac-2019-0809$$gVol. 92, no. 9, p. 1447 - 1467$$n9$$p1447 - 1467$$tPure and applied chemistry$$v92$$x0033-4545$$y2020
000180978 9101_ $$0I:(DE-HGF)0$$6P:(DE-He78)5f0460f01de6e6633ab2f2253a8998dc$$aExternal Institute$$b14$$kExtern
000180978 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2021-01-30
000180978 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEssential Science Indicators$$d2021-01-30
000180978 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences$$d2021-01-30
000180978 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0113$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded$$d2021-01-30
000180978 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection$$d2021-01-30
000180978 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bPURE APPL CHEM : 2019$$d2021-01-30
000180978 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2021-01-30
000180978 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2021-01-30
000180978 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search$$d2021-01-30
000180978 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC$$d2021-01-30
000180978 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5$$d2021-01-30
000180978 9801_ $$aEXTERN4VITA
000180978 980__ $$ajournal
000180978 980__ $$aEDITORS
000180978 980__ $$aI:(DE-He78)W500-20160331