% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Raut:181117,
author = {J. Raut$^*$ and M. Bhardwaj$^*$ and T. Niedermaier$^*$ and
K. Miah$^*$ and P. Schrotz-King$^*$ and H. Brenner$^*$},
title = {{A}ssessment of a {S}erum {M}icrorna {R}isk {S}core for
{C}olorectal {C}ancer among {P}articipants of {S}creening
{C}olonoscopy at {V}arious {S}tages of {C}olorectal
{C}arcinogenesis.},
journal = {Cells},
volume = {11},
number = {15},
issn = {2073-4409},
address = {Basel},
publisher = {MDPI},
reportid = {DKFZ-2022-01786},
pages = {2462},
year = {2022},
note = {#EA:C070#EA:C120#LA:C070#LA:C120#},
abstract = {We recently derived and validated a serum-based microRNA
risk score (miR-score) which predicted colorectal cancer
(CRC) occurrence with very high accuracy within 14 years of
follow-up in a large population-based cohort. Here, we aimed
to assess and compare the distribution of the miR-score
among participants of screening colonoscopy at various
stages of colorectal carcinogenesis. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) were
profiled by quantitative-real-time-polymerase-chain-reaction
in the serum samples of screening colonoscopy participants
with CRC (n = 52), advanced colorectal adenoma (AA, n =
100), non-advanced colorectal adenoma (NAA, n = 88), and
participants free of colorectal neoplasms (n = 173). The
mean values of the miR-score were compared between groups by
the Mann-Whitney U test. The associations of the miR-score
with risk for colorectal neoplasms were evaluated using
logistic regression analyses. MicroRNA risk scores were
significantly higher among participants with AA than among
those with NAA (p = 0.027) and those with CRC (p = 0.014),
whereas no statistically significant difference was seen
between those with NAA and those with no colorectal
neoplasms (p = 0.127). When comparing adjacent groups,
miR-scores were inversely associated with CRC versus AA and
positively associated with AA versus NAA [odds ratio (OR),
0.37 $(95\%$ confidence interval (CI), 0.16-0.86) and OR,
2.22 $(95\%$ CI, 1.06-4.64) for the top versus bottom
tertiles, respectively]. Our results are consistent with the
hypothesis that a high miR-score may be indicative of an
increased CRC risk by an increased tendency of progression
from non-advanced to advanced colorectal neoplasms, along
with a change of the miR-patterns after CRC manifestation.},
keywords = {blood-based (Other) / colorectal cancer (Other) / miRNA
(Other) / risk stratification (Other) / risk-adapted
screening (Other)},
cin = {C070 / C120 / C060 / HD01},
ddc = {570},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)C070-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)C120-20160331 /
I:(DE-He78)C060-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)HD01-20160331},
pnm = {313 - Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention (POF4-313)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:35954306},
doi = {10.3390/cells11152462},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/181117},
}