001     181165
005     20240229145642.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.08.003
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a pmid:35964896
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a 1542-3565
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1542-7714
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a altmetric:134088028
|2 altmetric
037 _ _ |a DKFZ-2022-01818
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Chen, Hongda
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Comparison of Colonoscopy, Fecal Immunochemical Test, and Risk-adapted Approach in a Colorectal Cancer Screening Trial (TARGET-C).
260 _ _ |a New York, NY
|c 2023
|b Elsevier Science
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1677147683_6895
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
500 _ _ |a Volume 21, Issue 3, March 2023, Pages 808-818
520 _ _ |a The screening yield and related cost of a risk-adapted screening approach compared with established screening strategies in population-based CRC screening are not clear.We randomly allocated 19,373 participants into one of the three screening arms in a 1:2:2 ratio: (1) one-time colonoscopy (n=3,883); (2) annual fecal immunochemical test (FIT) (n=7,793); (3) annual risk-adapted screening (n=7,697), in which, based on the risk-stratification score, high-risk participants were referred for colonoscopy, and low-risk ones were referred for FIT. Three consecutive screening rounds were conducted for both the FIT and the risk-adapted screening arms. Follow-up to trace the health outcome for all the participants was conducted over the 3-year study period. The detection rate of advanced colorectal neoplasia (CRC and advanced precancerous lesions) was the main outcome. The trial was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (number: ChiCTR1800015506).In the colonoscopy, FIT, and risk-adapted screening arms over three screening rounds, the participation rates were 42.4%, 99.3%, and 89.2%, respectively; the detection rates for advanced neoplasm (intention-to-treat analysis) were 2.76%, 2.17%, and 2.35%, respectively, with odds ratio (OR)colonoscopyvs.FIT of 1.27 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.99-1.63; P=0.056), ORcolonoscopyvs.risk-adapted screening of 1.17 (95% CI: 0.91-1.49; P=0.218), and ORrisk-adapted screeningvs.FIT of 1.09 (95% CI: 0.88-1.35; P=0.438); the numbers of colonoscopies needed to detect one advanced neoplasm were 15.4, 7.8, and 10.2, respectively; the costs for detecting one advanced neoplasm from a government perspective using package payment format were CNY6,928 ($1,004), CNY5,821 ($844), and CNY6,694 ($970), respectively.The risk-adapted approach is a feasible and cost-favorable strategy for population-based CRC screening, and therefore could complement the well-established one-time colonoscopy and annual repeated FIT screening strategies.
536 _ _ |a 313 - Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention (POF4-313)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313
|c POF4-313
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed, , Journals: inrepo02.dkfz.de
650 _ 7 |a colonoscopy
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a colorectal cancer screening
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a fecal immunochemical test
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a personalized screening
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a risk stratification
|2 Other
700 1 _ |a Shi, Jufang
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Lu, Ming
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Li, Yanjie
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Du, Lingbin
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Liao, Xianzhen
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Wei, Donghua
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Dong, Dong
|b 7
700 1 _ |a Gao, Yi
|b 8
700 1 _ |a Zhu, Chen
|b 9
700 1 _ |a Ying, Rongbiao
|b 10
700 1 _ |a Zheng, Weifang
|b 11
700 1 _ |a Yan, Shipeng
|b 12
700 1 _ |a Xiao, Haifan
|b 13
700 1 _ |a Zhang, Juan
|b 14
700 1 _ |a Kong, Yunxin
|b 15
700 1 _ |a Li, Furong
|b 16
700 1 _ |a Zou, Shuangmei
|b 17
700 1 _ |a Liu, Chengcheng
|b 18
700 1 _ |a Wang, Hong
|b 19
700 1 _ |a Zhang, Yuhan
|b 20
700 1 _ |a Lu, Bin
|b 21
700 1 _ |a Luo, Chenyu
|b 22
700 1 _ |a Cai, Jie
|b 23
700 1 _ |a Tian, Jianbo
|b 24
700 1 _ |a Miao, Xiaoping
|b 25
700 1 _ |a Ding, Kefeng
|b 26
700 1 _ |a Brenner, Hermann
|0 P:(DE-He78)90d5535ff896e70eed81f4a4f6f22ae2
|b 27
|u dkfz
700 1 _ |a Dai, Min
|b 28
773 _ _ |a 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.08.003
|g p. S1542356522007674
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2102638-5
|n 3
|p 808-818
|t Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology
|v 21
|y 2023
|x 1542-3565
909 C O |p VDB
|o oai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:181165
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 27
|6 P:(DE-He78)90d5535ff896e70eed81f4a4f6f22ae2
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Gesundheit
|l Krebsforschung
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-310
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-313
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-300
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2022
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b CLIN GASTROENTEROL H : 2022
|d 2023-10-25
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2023-10-25
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2023-10-25
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2023-10-25
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2023-10-25
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1110
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Clinical Medicine
|d 2023-10-25
915 _ _ |a IF >= 10
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9910
|2 StatID
|b CLIN GASTROENTEROL H : 2022
|d 2023-10-25
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)C070-20160331
|k C070
|l C070 Klinische Epidemiologie und Alternf.
|x 0
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)C120-20160331
|k C120
|l Präventive Onkologie
|x 1
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)HD01-20160331
|k HD01
|l DKTK HD zentral
|x 2
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)C070-20160331
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)C120-20160331
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)HD01-20160331
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21